March 5, 2021

2020–2021 City Council: Linda Leeuwrik, Rick Cheatum, Roger Bray, Claudia Ortega (back row); Heidi Adamson, Brian Blad, Chris Stevens (front row) (Photo Credit: City of Pocatello)

Yesterday’s Pocatello City Council meeting saw Pocatello’s face covering ordinance maintained.

During the meeting a motion was made by Councilmember Rick Cheatum and seconded by Councilmember Heidi Adamson to prepare an ordinance for the March 18 meeting that repeals the face covering ordinance.  This motion was defeated on a 2-3 vote, supported by Cheatum and Adamson, and opposed by Councilmembers Roger Bray and Linda Leeuwrik, with Mayor Brian Blad voting against and breaking the tie due to the absence of Councilmember Claudia Ortega.

A motion was then made by Adamson and seconded by Cheatum.  It was to direct staff to prepare an ordinance that repeals the City’s face covering ordinance to be considered at the April 1 meeting and each first regular City Council meeting of the month after that, if needed.  This motion carried unanimously.

The City of Pocatello issued the following press release regarding the ordinance:

Thursday, the City Council voted to continue Pocatello’s face covering ordinance for at least another month.  The ordinance will be revisited at the City Council’s April 1 meeting. 

Additionally, the Council voted to direct staff to prepare an ordinance that repeals the City’s face covering ordinance to be considered at the April 1 meeting and each first regular City Council meeting after that, if needed.  Under Idaho law, an ordinance can only be repealed by another ordinance.

Under the ordinance, “every person shall, when in any indoor or outdoor public place, completely cover their nose and mouth when members of the public are physically present for otherwise unprotected social interaction with persons other than household members.”

Exceptions are provided for: 

  • Children under the age of 5.
  • Persons who cannot medically tolerate wearing a face covering. A person is not required to provide documentation demonstrating that the person cannot medically tolerate wearing a face covering.
  • Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing, or communicating with a person who is deaf or hard of hearing, where the ability to see the mouth is essential for communication.
  • Persons, including on-duty law-enforcement officers, for whom wearing a face covering would create a risk to the person related to their work, as determined by local, state, or federal regulators or workplace safety guidelines.
  • Persons who are obtaining a service involving the nose, face, or head for which temporary removal of the face covering is necessary to perform the service.
  • Persons who are eating or drinking at a restaurant or other establishment that offers food or beverage service, so long as the person is able to maintain social distancing, as recommended by the CDC, from persons who are not members of the same household or party as the person.
  • Persons who are incarcerated.
  • Patrons of gyms so long as the gym is following a plan approved by the local health district.
  • Outdoor and/or indoor public places where people can maintain social distancing as recommended by the CDC.

To view the ordinance, visit bit.ly/3ffLWi8.

A list of frequently asked questions about the ordinance is available at bit.ly/2VXMoc1.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.