(Pocatello for Accountable Government Entities, October 27, 2025)
Remember the City’s new Central Square Solution’s “FINANCE ENTERPRISE” ERP platform highlighted last month?
When questioned at the Gate City Coffee Forum, Mayor Blad said the project had been TERMINATED!
Blad explained that about $500K in ARPA funds had been invested into the new finance platform, but that the system was not built for a city the size of Pocatello. It didn’t work, causing a lot of problems. He then said that the day after they stopped using it, the reports got better, easier to read & understand, etc.
PROBLEMS
- ARPA FUNDS – Although day-to-day City operations are under the authority of the Mayor, termination of this federally-funded project requires a formal TERMINATION Agreement which requires Council approval. The Mutual Termination Agreement signed in July 2025 was NOT brought to Council during a publicly noticed meeting. Given this is an incomplete project & what was completed is not being used – is it eligible for ARPA
- WASTED FUNDS – Actual cost of this project FAR EXCEEDS the $521,455.50 paid to Central Square since that total does not include the cost of all the staff time and effort. Staff worked on this project for at least 20 MONTHS and included the hiring of a new employee in October 2023 to specifically lead/facilitate this project.
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
- The system was operational and undergoing testing at the beginning of 2025—it was being used concurrently with the old system per statements made in meetings. The decision was made to delay a full switch-over until October 1st to ensure a cleaner auditing process for FY25 without the complication of two systems.
- The project included some fixes to reporting capabilities. We saw evidence of new EXCEL expenditure reports within Next Request (requested by previous councils but extremely difficult/labor intensive under the old system.) Hopefully this component is not impacted.
- Based on some records requested/received, and statements made during budgeting earlier this year, the new “Finance Enterprise” system was INCOMPATIBLE with Utility Billing. Since this was known at the start of the project, and clear in both the presentation and contract documentation (available online), this fact should not have had any impact.
- When converting to a new system, it’s not uncommon that all components cannot be brought together simultaneously. Conversions are often done in phases to make the project more doable and to spread the cost. It is also not uncommon that additional modules are required to bring other pieces into the system.
- In his 03/09/23 presentation, the CFO highlighted the importance of shifting to a system that would bring the City into the 21st century and provide accurate and timely information. The new system would have modernized the Finance system, provided timely access to information, spreadsheets, etc. A quick online search reveals the “Finance Enterprise ERP” is used by cities of various sizes and is not specific to very large cities. The Finance Enterprises’ ERP strength per its website is it “. . . connects every process—finance, HR, payroll—into a single, scalable system.” Scalable means that the system that can grow with the City.
- From speaking with outside experts, typical frustrations with such conversions originate from data not being in the correct format or not transferring easily or accurately, requiring labor-intensive efforts to ensure information accuracy. With time and additional assistance, these predictable obstacles can be overcome.
Terminating a contract and WASTING well over $600K of taxpayer funds is difficult to reconcile. Not to mention all the wasted staff time and effort.
This is just another example of Council being bypassed on an important decision. Or worse, Council abdicating their decision-making responsibilities. It’s well within Council authority to have asked questions of the service provider, questioned City staff, or requested additional information for a more informed decision. Six elected officials working together to make a critical decision in a public forum is far better than any decisions made behind closed doors.
Council should exercise the authority given to them and demand pertinent project information be discussed in a public forum and any decision to “pivot” away from a large-scale project that has cost taxpayers over $600K – be made by them. But, if by chance this specific decision WAS discussed amongst council members behind closed door prior to the termination agreement being signed, that makes the situation even more egregious.
The City MUST update their financial system at some point in the future. Mayor Blad’s decision sets them back to Day 1.
LINKS:
10/10/25 Mayoral Candidate Blad – Gate City Coffee Forum: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLIG6HUq55c
03/09/23 Work Session Presentation (time-stamp) URL: https://youtu.be/Zk6P65jmmhU?t=3107
05/18/23 Central Square – Financial Enterprise Contract: https://pocatello.gov/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Item/3823…
Central Square Info – “Finance Enterprise”: https://www.centralsquare.com/…/publ…/finance-enterprise
09/23/25 Facebook POST: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19xWEM1z9r/











