March 2, 2026
500 Bills. One Question: When Do We Say No?
If we believe in limited government, we must be willing to limit it.
By: Idaho Gang of Eight
As of March 2, nearly 500 pieces of legislation have been introduced in the Idaho Legislature. More are being filed daily as we approach the March 9 transmittal deadline.

That pace should give us pause. Not because lawmaking is wrong. But because every law carries consequences.
Legislation is not neutral.
Every new law builds something. It must be administered. Rules must be promulgated. This costs money. And over time, that means government growth.
Over the past six years, Idaho’s state budget has grown by roughly 60 percent. Nearly 40 percent of Idaho’s budget comes from federal funds, borrowed dollars from a federal government more than $38 trillion in debt.
This didn’t happen overnight. It happened one session at a time.
The Gang of Eight Budget Pledge calls for slowing that growth and restoring fiscal discipline. But discipline does not begin in JFAC. It begins when we decide whether a bill should exist at all.
If nearly 500+ policy bills are necessary in a single session, we should ask why.
Success is not measured by how many bills we pass. It is measured by whether those laws limit government, protect freedom, and keep Idaho free from federal control.
There are meaningful reforms moving this session.
Immigration reform passed the House. Pro–Second Amendment legislation has been introduced. Bills have been brought forward to prohibit taxpayer-funded promotion of government unions, reaffirm state authority where the Constitution reserves it, and protect constitutional rights in Idaho courts.
But grocery tax repeal still cannot get a hearing. CPS reforms have not received full debate. Real transparency on cloud seeding is stalled. Efforts to repeal vaccine mandates remain stuck in committee.
When expanding government is routine, but shrinking it requires a fight, that should concern anyone who believes in limited government.
Before passing a new law, we should ask a simple question:
Does this expand government — or restrain it?
A legislature that cannot say “No” will never control spending.
The goal is not fewer bills for the sake of fewer bills.
The goal is better laws and a government that does not need to grow in order to justify its existence.
In Liberty,
Senator Christy Zito, District 8
Zito4Idaho@protonmail.com
Senator Glenneda Zuiderveld, District 24
GZuiderveld@senate.idaho.gov
Substack: @glenneda
Senator Josh Kohl, District 25
JKohl@senate.idaho.gov
Substack: @joshkohl4idaho
Representative Faye Thompson, District 8
FayeforLD8@gmail.com
Representative Lucas Cayler, District 11
LCayler@house.idaho.gov
Substack: @lucascayler
Representative Kent Marmon, District 11
KMarmon@house.idaho.gov
Substack: @kentmarmon
Representative Clint Hostetler, District 24
CHostetler@house.idaho.gov
Substack: @theidahoresolve
Representative David Leavitt, District 25
DLeavitt@house.idaho.gov
Substack: @Leavitt4Idaho
























