Saturday, February 14, 2026
Home Blog

Guest Columnist Idaho Senator Christy Zito: Protecting Freedom for Future Generations

0

February 12, 2026

Protecting Freedom for Future Generations

ID Senator Christy Zito (photo credit: Christy Zito)

We are five weeks into the Idaho Legislative session, and some very important issues are moving through the Legislature.

I have closely watched the Convention of States movement. Back in 2018, while serving on the Idaho House of Representatives’ State Affairs Committee, I realized that the Constitution is not broken.

The Problem Isn’t the Constitution—It’s That We’re Not Following It

I’ve spent years in the trenches of the Idaho Legislature and continue the fight to preserve our God-given freedoms, always guided by one simple truth: our Founders gave us a document of genius and restraint. The U.S. Constitution isn’t broken. It’s being deliberately ignored, twisted, and circumvented by those who swore oaths to defend it.

I hear ongoing calls for a “Convention of States” under Article V—pushing for term limits, balanced budgets, or curbs on federal power. The intentions sound noble: rein in Washington, restore balance, protect our liberties. But let me be clear, a convention of states poses a risk far greater to our freedom than any potential reward.

Article V gives no detailed rules—no enforceable limits on scope once delegates assemble, no guaranteed safeguards against runaway proposals. History shows interstate conventions can exceed their mandates (look at the original 1787 convention, called only to amend the Articles of Confederation, which instead scrapped them entirely).

In today’s polarized climate, with deep divisions across the nation, opening that door invites wholesale revision at exactly the wrong moment.

The Constitution we have is not the problem.

The problem is that those in power—elected and unelected—routinely violate it:

  • Federal agencies issue rules with the force of law, bypassing Congress and ignoring the separation of powers.
  • Spending spirals out of control, saddling our children and grandchildren with debt that mocks any notion of fiscal restraint.
  • Rights enumerated and reserved to the people and the states are eroded under stretched interpretations of the Commerce Clause or “general welfare.”
  • Executive actions and emergency declarations sideline legislatures and courts alike.

These aren’t failures of the document. They are failures of enforcement, accountability, and fidelity to oaths. If Congress truly wanted to balance the budget, for example, it could do so right now under the existing Constitution—yet it chooses not to. Proponents of a convention offer no real answer for what happens if delegates gather on that very issue.

We don’t need a convention to rewrite the rules—we need courage to enforce the rules already written.

Idahoans know this instinctively. We value our Constitution because it protects individual liberty, state sovereignty, and limited government. We’ve taken oaths to support and defend it—not to gamble on an untested process that could undermine it. I believe the power of the people lies in the power of the vote, not in convening a risky assembly that could hand our enemies (foreign or domestic) an opening to reshape the foundational law of the land.

Instead, let’s recommit to what works:

  • Electing representatives who actually read and respect the Constitution.
  • Holding federal officials accountable through elections, oversight, and legal challenges.
  • Defending our state’s rights and pushing back against overreach, as Idaho has done time and again.
  • Teaching the next generation why this document matters and why we must guard it jealously.

The Constitution isn’t perfect in the sense that men are imperfect, but it is the finest framework for self-government ever devised. Let’s not risk shortcuts. Let’s demand enforcement.

This is how we protect freedom for future generations—not by convening, but by conserving what the Founders entrusted to us.

God bless,
Senator Christy Zito
District 8

Guest Columnist Martin Hackworth: Why Do So Many People Think Trump Is Good?

0

January 30, 2026

Q: Why Do So Many People Think Trump Is Good?
A: Because he delivers.

By: Martin Hackworth

“There’s a question that’s been bugging me for nearly a decade. How is it that half of America looks at Donald Trump and doesn’t find him morally repellent? He lies, cheats, steals, betrays, and behaves cruelly and corruptly, and more than 70 million Americans find him, at the very least, morally acceptable. Some even see him as heroic, admirable, and wonderful. What has brought us to this state of moral numbness?” – David Brooks, The Atlantic

Last summer, David Brooks, every liberal’s favorite conservative columnist, wrote an essay for The Atlantic, Why Do So Many People Think Trump is Good? In this essay, Brooks blames the rise of Trump on the decline of what were once the shared moral values of Western civilization. Brooks draws on the works of Alasdair MacIntyre, a philosopher who studied the manner in which the Enlightenment redefined morality as a palette of choices for individuals as opposed to a set of shared cultural mores.

Brooks’s piece amounted to a lengthy expansion on the idea of blaming Trump on deplorables. It’s also, IMO, completely off the mark. We’ll get to that presently. Nonetheless, the usual suspects hailed this piece as a masterpiece, though with minor quibbles over things that Brooks, in their opinions, missed.

Not me. The usual suspects may navel-gaze, philosophize, rant, rave or pontificate all they want about the reasons for Trump being elected twice, and they’ll continue to get it wrong as long as they embrace the notion that there is something fundamentally wrong with his supporters—something from which they, themselves, suffer no ill effects.

Trump’s supporters might actually be some of the most discerning individuals out there. The way that I see it, the reason that about half of America (according to Brooks) supports Trump isn’t because of moral turpitude. It’s also not because he’s a compassionate conservative, a great orator, a policy wonk who’s been in government for decades, a congenial uniter, or has the right vibes.

People support Trump because he delivers on what got him elected in a way that no other politician of my lifetime has. Second place isn’t even close.

On whether any of this is good or bad, I am agnostic. As I remind everyone with virtually every mention of Trump, he’s not my kind of guy. I think that Trump is a childish, petulant, corrupt megalomaniac and somewhat of a bully who has a weird fetish for La Cosa Nostra. He’s often his own worst enemy when it comes to getting things that he wants done. Listening to him talk gives me the heebie jeebies.

But having said that, I also think that if you can ignore all of the bombast and animus and focus on nuts and bolts, his actual record of accomplishment as POTUS is pretty good.

There’s that, and the fact that many of Trump’s foes are some of his most effective boosters. One simply cannot overestimate the degree to which the left is capable of self-immolating over TDS. In all things concerning Trump and politics, just consider the alternative. That proposition makes Trump’s foibles a lot more tolerable.

Trump is popular with supporters because he follows through as president on what he promised on the campaign trail—even when it’s hard. You are generally not going to hear Trump complain about how Congress is preventing him from doing what he wants because he’s good at leveling political obstacles—with glee. Trump has put the bully back in bully pulpit. Love him or not, you have to admit that not a lot gets in Trump’s way. I think that resonates with many voters. Even I cheer when I hear him go after woke.

Trump ran on border security, fighting woke, limited government, strengthening our military, restoring American prestige around the world, a strong economy, fighting crime and not being Kamala Harris. He’s delivered across the board.

Illegal border crossings have dropped by over 80% and ICE operations are generally popular outside of blue cities and Capitol Hill.

Woke and DEI are in retreat. The bubble of madness surrounding gender identity has burst. Pronouns are no longer de rigueur in professional circles.

Just this week, it has emerged that the Trump administration is moving to repeal the EPA’s Obama-era “endangerment finding,” eliminating the legal basis for federal regulations that target greenhouse gases. You may believe, as I do, that climate change is real and driven by greenhouse gas emissions and still believe, also as I do, that there is no mandate in the Constitution for the government to do anything about it.

Our geopolitical enemies are learning to worry about our military once again. You may feel some discomfort at the way that Trump is using the military to go after “narco-terrorists,” but you should then think about why he uses that particular term in describing targets. Then look up the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012, wherein President Obama gave himself (and any future president) the right to do whatever they pleased with anyone they could, by any stretch, label a terrorist. Obama handed Trump all the tools that he needs to get after virtually anyone he dislikes, with all of the tools at his disposal.

American prestige is, I suppose, in the eye of the beholder. But there are two ways to cultivate respect: fondness and fear. Of the two, fear is more immediate and leaves a much more lasting impression. I couldn’t care less if Iran loves or hates us. What I care about is that they are way worried about what we’ll do if they keep killing their own people for insufficient piety and building nukes. Kumbaya can wait until later. Ditto for Hamas, Britain, the EU and the UN.

The economy still has some issues, but job growth is strong, inflation has retreated, interest rates are declining and the DJIA has been over 50,000 for most of this week. Newspaper headlines are filled with descriptions of declining crime statistics (though I would suggest some caution in treating these as anything other than preliminary).

And lastly, Harris really was for they/them. Trump is for you.

No president of my lifetime, which goes back to Eisenhower, has delivered on his promises like Donald J. Trump. No excuses, no bullshit. He’s pretty much done exactly what he said that he would do. I have to admire that even if I think that as a complete human being, he’s got some deficits. I respect people who do what they say that they are going to do. I’m not going to let perfect be the enemy of good.

As much as you and I may get this, as long as the left and the chattering classes continue to imagine that their contempt for Trump and his supporters is rooted in some virtue inaccessible to the hoi polloi, they are going to continue to miss the boat. Trump’s support is strong not because people generally love him as a person; it’s because they respect him as a politician who does what he said that he’d do if they voted for him. That’s unique enough to be worthy of respect.

Associated Press and Idaho Press Club-winning columnist Martin Hackworth of Pocatello is a physicist, writer, and retired Idaho State University faculty member who now spends his time with family, riding bicycles and motorcycles, and arranging and playing music. Follow him on X at @MartinHackworth, on Facebook at facebook.com/martin.hackworth, and on Substack at martinhackworthsubstack.com.

FBI Releases Domestic Violence Special Report

0

(FBI Press Release, February 11, 2026)

On Wednesday, February 11, 2026, the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program released the “Domestic Relationships and Violent Crimes, 2020-2024” special report on the FBI’s Crime Data Explorer (CDE). The full report may be found in the Special Reports section.

This report focuses on violent crimes of murder, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault where the victim-to-offender relationship meets the UCR Program’s domestic and family violence definition. The crimes were reported to the FBI’s UCR Program by participating law enforcement agencies via the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS).

Over the five-year period studied, the percentage of violent crimes within domestic relationships increased. Law enforcement reported more than 11,000 domestic violence murder victims and an additional 1.1 million victims of domestic violence. Nearly 75 percent of the victims were female.

In addition to the domestic violence special report, the UCR Program also released an analysis of teen relationship violence in 2024. The reported data show there were more than 70,500 incidents of teen relationship violence in one year. Find more on the victims, relationships, and offenses on the CDE.

One of the main goals of the FBI’s UCR Program is to provide reliable data to be used in law enforcement administration, operation, and management. When agencies report detailed data to the FBI, this data can be analyzed by law enforcement and the greater criminal justice community to form strategies to reduce and impede similar offenses in the future.

War Dept. Strengthens Domestic Production of Critical Display Technologies

0

(Department of War Press Release, February 12, 2026)

The Department of War (DOW) announced today two September 19, 2025 investments totaling $24.5 million to bolster the U.S. supply chain for advanced optical displays. This announcement was delayed due to the government shutdown. The projects, funded through the Office of the Assistant Secretary of War for Industrial Base Policy (OASW(IBP))’s Industrial Base Analysis and Sustainment (IBAS) Program, were awarded this summer to Kopin Corporation of Westborough, Massachusetts and Tectus Corporation of Cupertino, California. They will focus on developing and validating a cost-effective manufacturing process for MicroLED displays that are essential for next-generation weapon systems.

“Microdisplays are crucial components in delivering information to the joint warfighter and are integrated into solutions across all domains including heads-up-displays for pilots, advanced night vision goggles, weapon optics, and unmanned systems,” said Assistant Secretary of War for Industrial Base Policy Michael Cadenazzi. “Securing a domestic supply of advanced MicroLED displays is vital for the Department’s next-generation defense applications, ensuring both performance and security.”

Both projects will establish an onshore, multi-vendor supply chain of state-of-the-art MicroLED displays. MicroLED technology promises to enable daylight readability with full-color symbology and imagery by delivering ultra-high brightness levels that remain visible in direct sunlight, while also supporting high image quality at low brightness for nighttime operations. The technology also allows for reduced size, weight and power, improving warfighter capability and effectiveness.

These investments demonstrate the Department’s commitment to strengthening domestic manufacturing and securing critical supply chains. They also support the Secretary of War’s priority of Rebuilding the Military by ensuring that there are reliable, trusted U.S. manufacturers of state-of-the-art micro-displays to enable successful development, delivery, and operation of next-generation weapon systems.

Since the IBAS Program’s inception in 2014, the Innovation Capability and Modernization (ICAM) Office has invested over $2.6 billion across 205 projects to restore domestic manufacturing capacity and capability. ICAM is part of OASW(IBP)’s Manufacturing Capability Expansion and Investment Prioritization (MCEIP) Directorate within the Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of War for Industrial Base Resilience. For more information on MCEIP, please visit: https://www.businessdefense.gov/ibr/mceip/index.html.

About the Office of the Assistant Secretary of War for Industrial Base Policy (OASW(IBP))

The OASW(IBP) works with domestic and international partners to forge and sustain a robust, secure, and resilient industrial base enabling the warfighter, now and in the future. The OASW(IBP)’s Innovation Capability and Modernization (ICAM) Office, which manages the IBAS Program, provides DOW with key capabilities to achieve the strategic aims of Department priorities and Presidential Executive Orders. These call for a strong, resilient, responsive, and healthy national industrial base that can respond at-will to national security requirements.

Pocatello Sanitation Collection to Operate as Normal on Presidents’ Day

0

(City of Pocatello Press Release, February 12, 2026)

The City of Pocatello Sanitation Services collection trucks will operate as normal on Presidents’ Day, Monday, February 16.

Residents with a Monday collection day for garbage and recycling are asked to place their autocarts at the curb by 7 a.m. for pickup.

Officials would like to remind residents that the Bannock County Landfill will be closed in observance of the holiday. For more information on the Sanitation Services, visit Pocatello.gov/sanitation or call 208-234-6192.

Guest Columnist Brian Almon: When to Take the Points

0
(Image Credit: Gem State Chronicle)

February 11, 2026 (Cover Image Credit: Gem State Chronicle)

When to Take the Points
Play the game on the field before you, not the one in your head

By: Brian Almon

Brian Almon

I haven’t watched much professional sports lately—it really is a black hole for time and energy. But I kept an eye out as the Seattle Seahawks, a team I’ve rooted for since childhood, made their way through the NFL playoffs.

I often use football analogies in politics, and the past few games provided ample examples. Near the end of the NFC Championship Game, with the LA Rams trailing the Seahawks 31–27, coach Sean McVay chose to go for it on 4th down and 4 at the Seattle 6-yard line. McVay was hoping to take the lead rather than kick a field goal and give the ball back while down by one with less than five minutes to go.

However, the Seahawks defended a pass attempt, and the Rams turned the ball over on downs. LA was able to stop Seattle and get the ball back with 25 seconds left on the clock, but that was not enough time to march down the field and score a touchdown. Had the Rams elected to take the field goal, they might have been in that same position down one rather than four, which changes the calculus completely. In that situation, they may have been able to get into range and stop the clock in time to kick a game-winning field goal.

Seahawks coach Mike Macdonald played a much more conservative game in Super Bowl LX last weekend. Kicker Jason Myers was a perfect five for five in field goal attempts, as Seattle was content to take three points whenever it could. Punter Michael Dickson was active as well, with seven punts—three of them pinning the New England Patriots inside their own six-yard line.

There are times for aggression and times for playing conservatively. Seattle led 9–0 at halftime and 12–0 at the end of the third quarter, but despite the score, the game really wasn’t close. The Seahawks defense was completely dominating the New England offensive line, and the coach made the sensible decision to bank as many points as possible while consistently forcing the Patriots into terrible field position.

What does that mean for politics? It means take the points whenever they’re available and then come back for more. It means play the game that develops, not the one you imagined in your head.

I’ve noticed a storm brewing on the fringes of the internet regarding geoengineering and weather modification. A small but loud group, convinced the government is deliberately poisoning us by spraying chemicals into the sky, wants to ban the practice—whatever it might entail. This week, Sen. Tammy Nichols introduced a fairly narrow bill requiring transparency in cloud-seeding projects. That set off quite a tempest, with online activists accusing Nichols of selling out because her bill doesn’t ban everything all at once.

Without wading into the weather-modification debate itself, this seems like a case where kicking the field goal is the reasonable course of action. Sen. Nichols’ bill seeks to bring transparency and data to the practice of cloud seeding—data that will be necessary for any future debate about whether to continue allowing it. Until we have that data, all the outrage in the world won’t get any legislation past the finish line.

People often worry that taking the points now means forgoing chances for future action. That’s a legitimate fear. Consider the dueling E-Verify bills we’ve seen this year. The Senate version, sponsored by Sen. Mark Harris, looks very much like a veneer crafted to maintain the status quo and allow industries that have come to depend on illegal labor to claim the problem is solved. On the other hand, Rep. Jordan Redman’s bill appears much stronger, requiring all employers to use E-Verify to ensure their employees have the legal right to work in our country.

Passing the Senate bill, in this case, would be like kicking a field goal on second-and-goal. It would be a premature compromise when we have a chance for something much better.

One more example of why it often makes sense to take the points when you can and then come back for more: In Idaho, minors under age 17 are required to take a certified driver’s education course, whether through a public school or a private provider. Several lawmakers have worked for years to change the law to allow parents to teach their own children how to drive, after which the child could take the same test required for a driver’s license.

  • In 2020, then-Rep. Christy Zito had a bill drafted to repeal driver’s ed requirements, but it failed to receive a hearing.
  • In 2021, Rep. Brandon Mitchell sponsored a similar bill near the end of the session, which languished in the amending order.
  • In 2022, Rep. Ron Mendive took up the issue, sponsoring a bill to allow parents to teach their own children how to drive. It passed the House overwhelmingly but failed to receive a hearing in the Senate.
  • In 2023, Mendive sponsored another bill, which passed both chambers but was vetoed by Gov. Brad Little. Despite a veto-proof majority in the House, 22 members declined to override the governor on this issue.
  • In 2024, Mendive came back again, this time with a narrowly-tailored bill to allow parents in rural areas lacking access to driver’s ed programs to teach their own children how to drive. This bill passed the Legislature and was signed into law.
  • In 2025, Mendive carried a bill that made virtual learning a valid option for completing the in-class portion of driver’s ed coursework.

Rep. Mendive introduced yet another bill this week that would allow any parent to choose to teach their children how to drive. If passed, it would fulfill the original idea of giving parents more options while still maintaining the test that all minors must pass before receiving a full driver’s license.

This shows the value of perseverance in the political process. Proponents of allowing parents to teach their own children to drive have kicked a couple of field goals and, at times, punted to gain good field position. Now they stand at the goal line, ready to score a touchdown. They did not give up after the first bill failed to receive a print hearing, nor after the governor vetoed the 2023 bill. Accepting a compromise in 2024 did not stop them from returning again.

Good legislators and citizen activists must play the game as it presents itself. Once in a great while it might make sense to go for it on fourth down, but often the better course is to take the points and prepare to fight another day. Don’t be like the Rams coach, watching the Super Bowl from his couch because he got too aggressive at the wrong time.

Conservative legislative victories are possible if we play the game well—and that means playing patiently and smartly. I’ve spent the last six years watching what works and what doesn’t, trying to learn the game so I can help you play it wisely as well. Because this isn’t a game—it’s the future of our state, an inheritance for our posterity.

Editor’s note:  This article originally appeared in the Gem State Chronicle.  I encourage our readers to visit their website and consider subscribing.  Find this and other informative articles at the Gem State Chronicle here: About – Gem State Chronicle

Guest Column – ID GOP Chairwoman Dorothy Moon: Flags and Bathrooms, Oh My!

0

February 12, 2026

Flags and Bathrooms, Oh My!

By: Dorothy Moon, IDGOP Chairwoman

Dorothy Moon, Chairwoman of the Idaho Republican Party

Nearly two decades ago, I stood with millions of American taxpayers in demanding an end to bailouts, crony capitalism, and endless government spending. The Tea Party movement was a wake-up call to the political class that the working people of America were fed up.

How simple it seems looking back. If you had told me that in 2026 we would be debating city mayors flying rainbow pride flags and passing legislation to protect women’s bathrooms, I would not have believed it.

Yet here we are. As absurd as it may seem, this is a necessary fight to protect children, families, and our culture.

Last year, the Legislature passed a bill defining which flags may be flown on government buildings. Some may think this is a waste of time—that there are bigger fish to fry—but it was necessary to curtail cities such as Boise that were using their official status to promote divisive ideologies like the LGBTQ+ agenda and BLM.

The Boise mayor and a majority of the city council chose not to follow the law and instead found what appeared to be a loophole by voting to designate the pride flag as an “official flag” of the city.

Now our Republican lawmakers are back, spending their valuable and limited time closing that loophole to ensure that everyone is truly welcome in our great cities—not just those who subscribe to a particular socio-political viewpoint.

That bill passed the House State Affairs Committee on a party-line vote. Republicans were united in affirming that government offices should fly only those flags that represent all of us: the American flag, the Idaho flag, and flags representing our military, state universities, and Native American tribes.

Many of the same individuals who testified against the flag bill returned this week to oppose legislation requiring men to use the men’s restroom. Can you imagine anything more absurd? A small number of men derive perverse pleasure from dressing as women, using women’s restrooms, and expect the rest of society to accept it without question. As a woman (an adult human female) I find that not only ridiculous, but downright offensive.

It’s unfortunate that legislation is necessary to address this issue. But it is necessary, and our Republican lawmakers are once again taking action. That bill also passed committee this week and appears to have strong support.

I suspect I am not alone in feeling weary of this culture war. Personally, I would rather be talking about cutting taxes every day than debating divisive flags and restroom policies. But these are the battles of our time. Ronald Reagan said every generation must fight for liberty. I guess it’s up to this generation to fight for sanity as well.

Kuna Beef Packer Recalls Ground Beef Products That May Be Contaminated with E. Coli

0

(USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service Press Release, February 11, 2026)

Washington, D.C.–CS Beef Packers, LLC, a Kuna, Idaho establishment, is recalling approximately 22,912 pounds of raw ground beef products that may be contaminated with E. coli O145, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced today.

The raw ground beef items were produced on January 14, 2026. The following products are subject to recall [view labels]:

  • Cardboard cases containing eight 10-lb. chubs of “BEEF, COARSE GROUND, 73 L” with case code 18601, “Use/Freeze By: 02/04/26” and time stamps between 07:03 and 08:32 printed on two stickers placed on the outside of the case. The date and time stamps are also printed directly onto the clear packaging of the chub.
  • Cardboard cases containing four 10-lb. chubs of “FIRE RIVER FARMS CLASSIC BEEF FINE GROUND 73L” with case code 19583, “Use/Freeze By: 02/04/26” and time stamps between 07:03 and 08:32 printed on two stickers placed on the outside of the case. The date and time stamps are also printed directly onto the clear packaging of the chub.
  • Cardboard cases containing four 10-lb. chubs of “FIRE RIVER FARMS CLASSIC BEEF FINE GROUND 81L” with case code 19563, “Use/Freeze By: 02/04/26” and time stamps between 07:03 and 08:32 printed on two stickers placed on the outside of the case. The date and time stamps are also printed directly onto the clear packaging of the chub.

The products subject to recall bear establishment number “EST. 630” inside the USDA mark of inspection on the outside of the case and printed directly onto the clear packaging of the chub. These items were shipped to distributors in California, Idaho, and Oregon for further distribution to foodservice locations.

The problem was discovered during FSIS testing at a downstream customer, and the sampling results showed the presence of E. coli O145.

There have been no confirmed reports of illness due to consumption of these products. Anyone concerned about an illness should contact a healthcare provider.

E. coli O145, like the more common E. coli O157:H7, is a serovar of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC). People can become ill from STECs 2–8 days (average of 3–4 days) after exposure to the organism.

Most people infected with STEC O145 develop diarrhea (often bloody) and vomiting. Some illnesses last longer and can be more severe. Infection is usually diagnosed by testing of a stool sample. Vigorous rehydration and other supportive care is the usual treatment; antibiotic treatment is generally not recommended. Most people recover within a week, but, rarely, some develop a more severe infection. Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), a type of kidney failure, is uncommon with STEC O145 infection. HUS can occur in people of any age but is most common in children under 5 years old, older adults and persons with weakened immune systems. It is marked by easy bruising, pallor and decreased urine output. Persons who experience these symptoms should seek emergency medical care immediately.

FSIS is concerned that some products may be in foodservice freezers. Foodservice locations are urged not to serve these products. These products should be thrown away or returned to the place of purchase.

FSIS routinely conducts recall effectiveness checks to verify recalling firms notify their customers of the recall and that steps are taken to make certain that the product is no longer available to consumers. When available, the retail distribution list(s) will be posted on the FSIS website at www.fsis.usda.gov/recalls.

FSIS advises all consumers to safely prepare their raw meat products, including fresh and frozen, and only consume ground beef that has been cooked to a temperature of 160 degrees F. The only way to confirm that ground beef is cooked to a temperature high enough to kill harmful bacteria is to use a food thermometer that measures internal temperature, https://www.fsis.usda.gov/safetempchart.

Media with questions regarding the recall can contact Trevor Caviness, President of Caviness Beef Packers, at 806-372-5781 ext 4308 or Trevor@cavinessbeef.com. Consumers with questions regarding the recall can contact Roger Cooper, Operations Manager of CS Beef Packers, LLC, at 208-810-7510 ext 7531 or roger.cooper@csbeef.com.

Consumers with food safety questions can call the toll-free USDA Meat and Poultry Hotline at 888-MPHotline (888-674-6854) or send a question via email to MPHotline@usda.gov. For consumers that need to report a problem with a meat, poultry, or egg product, the online Electronic Consumer Complaint Monitoring System can be accessed 24 hours a day at https://foodcomplaint.fsis.usda.gov/eCCF/.

Pocatello: American Legion Steak Dinner is TONIGHT, February 13, 5-7PM

0

February 13, 2026

The American Legion’s monthly steak night, held on the 2nd Friday of each month, will be held tonight, February 13, from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., at the Bannock County Veterans Memorial Building, 300 N. Johnson Avenue in Pocatello.

For $20 per person ($12 per person for the medium meal) you can enjoy a hand-cut ribeye steak cooked over a charcoal fire, baked potato, assorted vegetables, baked beans, and their famous apple crisp with ice cream.

All proceeds help support programs sponsored by Pocatello’s American Legion Post 4.

 

Gov. Little Signs EO Reinstating Idaho Governor’s Trophy, Renewing Football Rivalry between BSU and U. of Idaho

0

(Governor’s Office Press Release, February 12, 2026)

Boise, Idaho – Governor Brad Little was joined by University of Idaho President Scott Green and Boise State Interim President Jeremiah Shinn to sign Executive Order 2026-02, the Recommissioning of the Idaho Governor’s Trophy, marking the return of this historic rivalry, set to resume in 2031.

“With the return of this great football rivalry between University of Idaho and Boise State University, today, we celebrate not just a game, but a tradition that unites our state, honors our history, and showcases the very best of Idaho.

Over time, conference realignment and shifting schedules have put many historic rivalries across the country on pause, including this one. Today I am excited to be reinstating this great tradition and recommissioning the Idaho Governor’s Trophy,” Governor Little said.

The historic game was announced by both Universities jointly on Thursday morning and will take place at Albertsons Stadium on Sept. 6, 2031.

“To host the Vandals in Boise and on The Blue, which is one of the most iconic places in the state of Idaho, is a great opportunity for not only both schools, but the entire state,” said Jeramiah Dickey, Boise State Director of Athletics. “I’m grateful to the Idaho athletics administration for working together on renewing the series and keeping the resources and support around this game within the state. It will also be great to showcase both universities and the longtime matchup on a national level when this game on the ‘Front Porch of Idaho’ becomes the talk of college football.”

“We are excited to renew our rivalry with Boise State and get back on the football field in 2031,” Terry Gawlik, Idaho’s Director of Athletics, said of the renewed rivalry. “We know how much this game means for both fan bases and the entire Gem State. I am grateful for the work of our staff, led by Tim Mooney, and the cooperation of Bronco Athletics. Thank you to Jeremiah Dickey for working together on this and to President Scott Green and Interim President Jeremiah Shinn at Boise State for helping us finalize this agreement.”

The matchup will be the 41st installment of the in-state showdown, and the first since Nov. 12, 2010. Boise State boasts a 22-17-1 all-time record against the Vandals, including a current 12-game winning streak.

The two teams played yearly from 1971-2010. The programs were both members of the Big Sky Conference from 1971-95 and continued the series for 15 consecutive seasons when the Broncos joined the FBS ranks in 1996.

The game against the Vandals marks Boise State’s second scheduled contest in 2031. The Broncos will host Memphis on Sept. 13, 2031.

The matchup will mark the second consecutive season that Boise State will play against an in-state opponent. The Broncos are set to host Idaho State on Sept. 7, 2030.

This is Idaho’s first game on the 2031 schedule. The Vandals have played an in-state team every year since 2018 and play Idaho State on an annual basis for the iconic Potato State Trophy.