Saturday, October 10, 2026
Home Blog

Idaho Freedom Caucus: Why We Oppose Proposition 1

0

(Idaho Freedom Caucus, October 8, 2026)

On November 3, Idaho voters will decide Proposition 1, the Reproductive Freedom and Privacy Act.

The Idaho Freedom Caucus firmly opposes this measure.

According to the official ballot language, Prop 1 would create a statutory right to abortion before fetal viability, allow abortion after viability in medical emergencies, and establish broader rights to reproductive freedom and privacy, with added legal protections for healthcare providers.

A NO vote would leave Idaho’s current abortion law in place.

The title emphasizes freedom, privacy, and healthcare, but voters should look at the actual language. Contraception, IVF, miscarriage care, prenatal care, childbirth care, and postpartum care are already legal in Idaho. We believe the central change is the creation of a broad new right to abortion.

Two Phrases Deserve Particular Attention

1. “Notwithstanding any other provision of law…”

This means the new right would apply even when another law conflicts with it. That could open existing abortion restrictions, parental-involvement requirements, and other protections to legal challenges.

2. “Every person”

This is broad language that raises questions about minors and people unable to make their own medical decisions. Prop 1 also protects any person or entity that advises, assists, facilitates, informs, refers, or otherwise helps someone exercise the new right.

Could an adult, organization, or government agency help a minor obtain an abortion without parental involvement?

Supporters say current parental-consent laws would remain. Critics anticipate court challenges. We believe parents deserve clear answers before this becomes law.

The wording also raises questions about other treatments. Prop 1 does not specifically mention puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, or gender-transition procedures, which Idaho separately restricts for minors. However, could attorneys argue that certain hormone treatments fall under the new reproductive rights? That question has not been decided by an Idaho court. We believe voters should understand that uncertainty.

Viability and Medical Emergencies Also Matter

The official ballot language describes viability as the ability to survive outside the womb “without extraordinary medical measures.”

Premature babies often survive with NICU care, oxygen, feeding support, incubators, and other technology. What would count as “extraordinary,” and how would that affect their legal protection?

After viability, Prop 1’s medical-emergency language includes threats to life or health, serious impairment of a bodily function, or serious dysfunction of an organ or body part—a broader standard than Idaho’s current law.

Women facing miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, sepsis, or other serious pregnancy complications deserve timely treatment. We believe Idaho can provide that care without adopting Prop 1’s broader abortion-rights framework.

Idaho Cannot Take This Vote for Granted

Idahoans should not assume the measure will fail because Idaho is conservative. Similar reproductive-rights measures have passed in Michigan, Ohio, Arizona, and Missouri.

In Florida, about 57% supported an abortion-rights amendment in 2024, but it failed because constitutional amendments require 60%. Idaho’s Prop 1 does not face that threshold.

Prop 1 is a statute, not a constitutional amendment, so future legislatures could change it. But changes would still require House and Senate approval, action by the governor, and potentially further court battles.

Voters should judge the language now, rather than count on lawmakers to fix it later.

Here’s How You Can Help

Read the initiative and share the official ballot language. https://voteidaho.gov/idaho-general-election/

Send this article to friends and family, and talk with neighbors, parents, grandparents, church members, and people who rarely follow politics.

Ask: “Have you actually read Proposition 1?”

Follow the Idaho Freedom Caucus, share our updates, and invite members to speak to local organizations.

Vote NO on November 3. The Idaho Freedom Caucus believes we can protect women, parental rights, and unborn children while keeping Idaho’s current abortion law in place.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio: In Defense of Western Civilization

0

October 7, 2026

In Defense of Western Civilization

By: U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio

There are great ruins all across the world. In many cases, they are places where history seems to have exhausted itself: remnants of distant cultures that have long passed beyond living memory.

But the Acropolis is different.

For thousands of years, the civilization that built what stands behind me has captivated the imagination of the Western world. Generations of our statesmen, artists, and philosophers have looked to it – they’ve looked to it with wonder and they’ve looked to it with awe.

Now time has a tendency to dull the senses: great victories and catastrophic defeats, they seem to shrink to becoming like a footnote in a textbook, another fact for our schoolchildren to memorize and forget. But the Greeks of antiquity, they seem to have an almost mystical hold on our memory. They call us back to them, again and again.

480 years before Christ, the armies of Xerxes arrived in this city and they put its sanctuaries to the torch. Most Athenians had by then evacuated by ship to a nearby island. But there was a handful of them that refused to leave their home. So instead, they barricaded themselves in the rocky fortress of the Acropolis to fight an extraordinary last stand, heaving massive stones down the cliffs onto the Persian invaders and holding the greatest empire of the age at bay for days. They were eventually overwhelmed. The Persians plundered the temples, burned the shrines, and razed the Acropolis to the ground but when the Athenians returned, they gathered the broken remains of the old Acropolis and buried them in the hill where it had stood. And decades later, under Pericles, they raised the Parthenon.

For 25 centuries since, the Parthenon has stood. Empires have risen and fallen beneath its shadow. And the progeny of the men who built it – the sons of Athens and Rome – have carried their civilization with them to the ends of the Earth.

Two and a half centuries after the founding of the American republic halfway across the world from where I stand now – I stand here today as the Secretary of State of that republic, and a great-grandson of settlers who arrived in the new world from Spain – I stand here to testify to a debt that no lapse of time, no distance of space can ever extinguish.

The history of America, the history of my country, is covered with the fingerprints of antiquity. Greece is literally carved into the architecture of our government: in the towering columns, in the domes and the monuments across our capital city. The city where our Constitution was born – Philadelphia – is itself a Greek name.

The men who founded my country were fascinated by the heritage we inherited from yours. They were exceptionally well-read in history – they were vividly aware of their unique place in it – but no other age of the past held their attention or their imagination quite like that of antiquity. Many, many people are surprised to learn that the most commonly cited author in the Federalist Papers was not an Enlightenment philosopher or political theorist. No, the most commonly cited author in the Federalist Papers was Plutarch, the Greek biographer of Greece and Rome’s great men.

Now, much has been written and said about the influence of ancient Greece on the ideas of the American Founders – and, for that matter, on all of the Western philosophers and statesmen that preceded them. Most of us are familiar with the basic history. Athens gave us democracy. Plato and Aristotle gave us Western philosophy. Our ideas of law, of virtue, of citizenship, and republican government were shaped in the Greek city-states. Even much of our political vocabulary – words like democracy, tyranny, the word “politics” itself – found its origins here.

Now, all of that is true. But the things we owe to this place – as Americans, and as Westerners – are actually far far deeper. These institutions and ideas – these institutions and ideas were the outward expression of more fundamental qualities we see in the ancient Greeks – qualities that can’t be reduced to any particular political system or theory.

Here, in Athens, we found the first full realization of all the essential traits that would come to define the West: fierce individuality and relentless ambition; daring exploration and invention; a yearning for discovery, for adventure, risk and glory. An insatiable curiosity about the world and the principles by which it operates, a hunger to know the mysteries of nature and grasp the secrets of the cosmos. An impatience with the notion of impossibility, chafing at all boundaries and limits, straining to peer into the depths of the unknown.

These were not just the formulas or precepts of a particular school of philosophy. They were the characteristic of a people – expressed in their traditions, their stories, their imagination; in the qualities they demanded of their citizens; in the things they lived and fought and died for.

To know them is to know ourselves.

What blossomed here in this place was the Western desire to uncover all that ignorance, darkness, and distance had kept hidden from the mind of man. The Greeks did not just shape history; the Greeks gave us history itself. Much about – much of what we know about many ancient civilizations comes almost entirely from the records of Greek explorers and historians, explorers and historians who didn’t just chronicle the histories of their own people, but ventured outwards to observe and record the sagas of foreign peoples and cultures all across the world.

Where others looked inward, the Greeks were the first to direct their focus outward, to chase the thrill and glory of seeing all that was strange and new. It was this trait – it was this trait that would push the West to create and build things that others could not, marking us out from so many other cultures and civilizations where stability and subsistence were the highest ends of life.

But it is not just the ambition to explore the unknown that we inherit from the Greeks; it is the conviction that the unknown can be known. The confidence that the world can be charted and measured and mapped and understood – and that there is a rational order to the cosmos, governed by certain fundamental laws, laws that men can observe and the mind can come to understand.

This was the foundation of the Western mind: our math, our science, our medicine. Our philosophy, ethics, and religion. It paved the way for the gospel of Jesus Christ to find fertile soil in Europe and flourish into the empire of Christendom. It was the foundation of the riches of Christian theology – of Augustine and Aquinas and the whole tradition of natural law.

It gave birth to a civilization marked not just by a common culture, it was marked by a common anthropology – a common view of man and his place in the universe. Its descendants would share not just the idea of a natural order, but a distinctive understanding of virtue; of destiny and fate; of truth, goodness, and beauty; of a code that dictates how men ought to live; of objective standards and ideals to strive towards.

For the Greeks of antiquity, the pursuit of excellence was the very principle of man’s existence. They organized all of civic life around contest, ambition, competition: in philosophy and poetry, in sculpture and drama, in athletics and art, in war and statecraft. The classical Greek city was an arena for great men to test and prove themselves, to hone their potential through perpetual struggle – to be the best, the strongest, the most beautiful, straining to inch ever closer to perfection.

Now I know that to modern ears, what I just described, this way of life, may sound odd; it may even sound cruel. The ideal of many ideologies in our time has, frankly, become a world of perfect safety, devoid of risk or failure, with neither the glory of victory nor the shame of defeat. Too often these days, we build downwards. We design our standards to ensure no one will lose; we preoccupy ourselves more with the comfort of the worst than the potential of the best. We hold the most exceptional things among us hostage to the average, the ordinary, the mediocre.

The men who made the Parthenon, they built upwards. They held that the highest and most noble aspiration in life was to surpass all others, to strive to be the best in all things. The ancient Greek city-states were filled. They were filled with intense passion and rivalry and faction and conflict. But from that constant struggle for distinction – from that came the great flowering of art and philosophy and political and intellectual energy that would transform a collective of Mediterranean cities into the birthplace of the greatest civilization in the world.

The thumos, as the ancient Greeks called it – the fire of passion, strength, courage, pride – is the heart of great civilization. And without it? Without it, nations lose their will to fight, the will to strive, the will to survive.

Today, too much of the West has forgotten this quality. Over time, we in the West came to feel ashamed of the very things that made us exceptional. We felt embarrassed that our achievements set us apart from the rest of the world. Our prosperity somehow became a source of guilt. We no longer believed we deserved and had earned our greatness.

The word “nationalism” became a dirty word. And so we tore down our monuments; we condemned our own history. And in too many places, we taught our children to be ashamed of the countries they would inherit. In the process, we opened our borders and outsourced our industry, and allowed our militaries to wither and to decay.

And with every passing year, we seemed to outsource more of our sovereignty, transferring our decisions to global bureaucracies far beyond the reach of our control.

But others were all too happy to fill the vacuum that we left – the vacuum left behind by our weakness. And as the West’s confidence faltered, its adversaries and its rivals only grew more assertive, building up their own wealth and their own power in our stead.

And now, today, we find ourselves at a crossroads. Because the next decade and the decisions we make will write the story of the next century. The course we take will determine whether the West maintains its place at the head of the world or resigns itself to a future of atrophy and servitude and decline. We will either choose to act now or lose the choice to act at all.

Under President Trump, the United States has made its choice. We choose the unapologetic pursuit of national power: to take back control of our critical supply chains, to reindustrialize our economy, to rebuild our defense, to fight for dominance of the technologies and industries of the future.

We choose to reach for new frontiers: in advanced manufacturing and super intelligence; in drones, weapons, and warfare; in chips, minerals, cyber, and every other domain of human possibility. To unleash our energy, to rebuild our factories, to return our astronauts to the moon and launch a new age of exploration in space.

Now for all their lofty ideals, the ancient Greeks were not naive. They understood that nations have interests. They understood that statecraft requires prudence and diplomacy, but they also understood that it requires the ability to wield force when prudence and diplomacy fail. They understood that power requires not only having the means to defend yourself, it requires the credibility that you are willing to use it.

This is the classical understanding of politics and of statecraft that the Trump Administration hopes to reclaim – reclaim not just for our country, but for the whole of our civilization.

We believe that Europe can awaken from its long slumber and rekindle the fire that was lit here millennia ago.

There are already signs.

Across this continent, we are witnessing what we hope will be the beginnings of a generational shift: skyrocketing defense spending, a flurry of new partnerships and programs, expanded manufacturing and production, following on the historic defense commitments made last year in The Hague.

Greece has been at the center of this shift. The people of this nation have proved themselves once again to be an indispensable friend to Europe and to the United States alike, on everything from energy to migration to defense, where Greece has been a model ally.

And it’s our sincerest hope that all of Europe will follow your example.

Though passions may, at times, have strained the bonds of affection between the United States and Europe, it must not be allowed to break them. Together, we must strengthen an alliance capable of confronting threats of our age.

And we can. Because we do not believe the transatlantic friendship should be zero sum. Quite the opposite: our vision is of an alliance whose strength is greater than the sum of its parts. It is a vision we saw in action just last month, in an unprecedented new agreement between the United States, Denmark, and Greenland – an agreement that will reshape the Arctic and bolster the security of all of NATO. All three partners in that deal emerged victorious. All of Europe – and NATO and the United States emerged safer, stronger, and more secure because of it.

We want to win together. We must win together.

Now it’s has become fashionable today to believe that enlightened foreign policy means prioritizing the global community over one’s own people. And I think here, too, we have much to learn from the men of ancient Greece because they knew that there was nothing selfish or wrong about loyalty to your nation, nor anything selfish or wrong about fighting to defend its interests above all else.

They believed – fiercely – in the ideal of the great man: the exceptional individual who obtains immortality through his own deeds. But they believed that glory and fame, those things were won through striving, sacrificing and achieving greatly for something larger than yourself. The recurring hero of the ancient Greek world was the man who was willing to pay any cost for a cause worthy of his loyalty.

We see this in Socrates, who refused to abandon the inquiry into truth even at the cost of his own life. We see it in the legendary stand of 300 Spartans – surrounded and hopelessly outnumbered by the vast armies of Persia – who refused the chance to save themselves, choosing to fight to the last man rather than abandon their post or abandon their duty. And we see it in the epic myth of Achilles, who is offered the choice to return home and live a long and peaceful life – but chooses instead to remain at Troy and perish in pursuit of eternal glory.

These – these are the qualities that would shape the Western moral imagination. From the Christian martyr who refused to betray his faith to the patriot who gave his life for his country; from Saint Thomas More to the Battle of the Alamo, running through the immortal closing words of the Declaration of Independence of the United States which says, “We mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.”

It is from the Greeks that the West inherited its sense of duty – an unbreakable loyalty to one’s code, one’s cause, one’s country. Our heroes, the heroes of the West are those who choose to remain faithful to their duty precisely when it is most difficult and painful to do so: the man who is bound by his word, the soldier who will not abandon his post, the captain, the proverbial captain, who goes down with his ship.

This is wholly different from what we see, even now, for example from fanatics like the radical mullahs of Iran, whose cult of death hails child suicide bombers as national heroes, and portrays martyrdom as an end to itself.

Our heroes – our heroes may be willing to die for their cause; but our heroes do not worship death. It is precisely because we value life that we come to recognize the heroism in those who would sooner sacrifice it than to betray their principles. Now, we take the West’s conception of these things – heroism, honor, duty – we take these things for granted. We assume that these somehow are universal to all people in all times and in all places. They are not. They are the product of a distinct character, a distinct character which arose here and shaped the whole story of the civilization that came after it. A civilization that we must fight to defend today with the same passion as our forefathers did.

The men who built the Parthenon were succeeded by the architects of European Christendom, who raised the cathedrals of Milan, Cologne, and Florence. The quest to perfect the human form that moved the ancient Greek sculptors found a new expression in Michelangelo. The Greek philosophers’ search for the structure of the universe was inherited by Copernicus, and then Galileo, then Kepler, and in Newton.

The hunger for new knowledge, that’s what gave birth to Magellan’s first expedition around the world, to Columbus’ discovery of the Americas, and ultimately to Apollo 11’s journey to the moon. And the qualities that led Alexander to conquer the entire known world reappeared in Caesar, then Charlemagne, and Cortes.

And in America, that same tradition rediscovered itself anew. An open and wild land became the site of a great revival of Western imagination and ambition. The Greek aspiration for new horizons became the American frontier spirit. The civilization of Athens and Rome transformed an infant seaboard republic into a continental empire.

The greatest Americans of every generation have carried the unmistakable features of their forefathers – born in Athens, formed by Rome, baptized in Christendom, hardened in the furnace of medieval Europe, endowed with the English genius for liberty, and then carried across the Atlantic to be reborn on the shores of a new world.

Together, we must now rediscover that spirit. We are at an inflection point – an inflection point not only in the history of my nation, but an inflection point in the whole of our civilization.

The threats we face today are every bit as real as they were on the dramatic stage of antiquity.

National interests did not vanish in the face of international institutions. War did not disappear simply because we preferred peace. Other states continued to arm, to seek influence, to compete for territory, and technology, and resources, and markets, and energy, and power.

And now, there is war again. There is new competition between great powers again. There is vulnerability, aggression, terrorism, a whole universe of new threats and attacks again.

And so we must rebuild our institutions and our alliances to face these threats together – understanding that the purpose of these things is not to abolish the sovereignty of the nations that constitute them; it is to defend them. And that nations need not abandon their distinct identities in order to recognize their common interests.

We have built a model of that with our partners here in Greece. In our defense partnerships, in energy and technology, in our shared ambition to secure Europe’s borders from the threats of mass migration.

Our friendship dates back to the earliest years of my nation. When Greece rose in 1821 to recover its independence after centuries of Ottoman rule, Americans recognized something familiar in that struggle. Three years later, the great American statesman Daniel Webster, he delivered a famous address to Congress, helping bring the cause of the Greek Revolution before the representatives of the young American republic.

And he began by calling their attention to everything around them. This is what he said in his speech; he said: “This free form of government, this popular assembly… this practice of free debate, and public discussion, the contest of mind with mind… even the edifice in which we assemble, these proportioned columns, this ornamented architecture, all remind us that Greece has existed, and that we, like the rest of mankind, are greatly her debtors.”

Those words are as true today as they were when he said them. And all of us – not just Americans, but Europeans and our friends across the West – must relearn the lessons our forefathers took from this place and from its history.

The history of Greece – the history of Greece does not just offer us a glimpse – it does not offer a glimpse of our institutions in their earliest forms. The history of Greece shows us an image of ourselves.

It shows us that ours is the inheritance of great heroes, and that we should be proud – that we should be intensely proud – of where we come from. We should marvel at what our forefathers carved out of this countryside. The story of our civilization is the greatest story ever known to man. And it began here, with the first men and women of the West. From them – from them – we can rediscover the virtues, the courage, and the strength to confront the dangers that we face in our time.

Thank you.

Marco Rubio was sworn in as the 72nd Secretary of State on January 21, 2025. The Secretary is creating a Department of State that puts America First.

Gem State Chronicle Report: Bart Davis Steps Down As US Attorney for Idaho

0
(Image Credit: Gem State Chronicle)

(Gem State Chronicle Publisher Brian Almon, October 8, 2026)

On Wednesday, October 7, Bart Davis announced his retirement as U.S. attorney for the District of Idaho, effective October 17. The announcement came just one year after Davis was confirmed by the Senate to serve in that position for a second time, following a previous tenure during President Donald Trump’s first administration.

Davis spent 19 years in the Idaho State Senate, including 15 as majority leader, before his first appointment as U.S. attorney. Prior to his political career, Davis practiced law in his hometown of Idaho Falls after graduating from BYU in 1978 and receiving his law degree from the University of Idaho in 1980.

As U.S. attorney, Davis was the chief federal prosecutor for Idaho, representing the U.S. Department of Justice in criminal prosecutions and civil litigation. He oversaw cases involving drug trafficking, violent crime, fraud, immigration violations, and other federal offenses, while also coordinating with federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies. U.S. attorneys are nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate, serving at the pleasure of the president. Incoming presidents often replace U.S. attorneys at the start of their terms, as President Joe Biden did in 2021 when he asked for Davis’ resignation. President Trump reappointed Davis in 2025.

Davis oversaw three offices—in Boise, Coeur d’Alene, and Pocatello—staffed by 65 employees. During his second term, his office filed 298 criminal cases.

Davis also co-chaired Idaho’s bipartisan redistricting commission in 2021, having been appointed by then-Senate President Pro Tempore Chuck Winder.

With Davis having recently turned 71 and celebrating his 50th wedding anniversary, his retirement is not especially unusual, but the timing is, coming just a year after his confirmation for a second term. Davis did not give a specific reason for retiring at this time.

President Trump is expected to nominate a successor, relying on Sens. Mike Crapo and Jim Risch for input on whom to choose. Potential successors include Justin Whatcott, who served as acting U.S. attorney prior to Davis’ confirmation; Sen. Todd Lakey, a former county prosecutor and practicing attorney who was reportedly under consideration prior to Davis’ nomination in 2025; Rafael Gonzalez, who also served as acting U.S. attorney on multiple occasions; Rep. John Shirts, another lawyer in the Legislature who previously served as an assistant U.S. attorney during Davis’ first term; and Theo Wold, who served in President Trump’s first administration as well as solicitor general in Attorney General Raúl Labrador’s office.

No successor has been publicly announced.

Should Lakey or Shirts be appointed, their departure from the Legislature would create a vacancy to be filled through the usual process: the respective Republican legislative district committee would submit three names to Gov. Brad Little, who would appoint one to the seat. Idaho’s current legislative term ends November 30, with the new term beginning December 1.

About Brian Almon

Brian Almon is the Editor of the Gem State Chronicle. He also serves as Chairman of the District 14 Republican Party and is a trustee of the Eagle Public Library Board. He lives with his wife and five children in Eagle.

Editor’s note:  This article originally appeared in the Gem State Chronicle.  I encourage our readers to visit their website and consider subscribing.  Find this and other informative articles at the Gem State Chronicle here: About – Gem State Chronicle

Know Your Species Before Heading into the Mountains This Fall

0

(Idaho Fish and Game Press Release, September 30, 2026; Article photos credit: Idaho Fish and Game)

It may seem easy, but correctly identifying your target species can be a challenge at times

Is that a mule deer or a white-tailed deer? A moose or an elk? A black bear or a grizzly bear? These are questions asked and thoughts pondered by many a sportsman each hunting season.

While it may seem like an easy task, correctly identifying your target species can be challenging at times. Weather conditions, distance from the animal, and misleading appearances can be factors that complicate the task.

Freshen up your identification skills by reviewing characteristics of a few species in Idaho that are commonly misidentified.

Mule Deer vs. White-tailed Deer

Mule deer:

  • Large ears relative to their heads
  • White rumps
  • Rope-like tail with a black tip
  • Antlers of older males fork and fork again
mule deer

mule deer buck in grass medium shot January 2016

White-tailed deer:

  • Small ears relative to their heads
  • Brown rump
  • Brown tail with white fringe
  • Bottom of erect tail is completely white
  • Antlers of older males consist of main beams with tines pointing upward
whitetail

white-tailed_deer_buck

Moose vs. Elk

Moose

  • Dark brown to almost black fur; uniform color across the body
  • Dewlap or “beard” (fur-covered skin below the chin)
  • Dorsal hump behind the neck
  • Wide palmate or paddle-shaped antlers (male)
  • Long, broad nose with visible fatty pads near nostrils
  • Solitary; though females may be seen with calves or yearlings
moose

Elk:

  • Tan to brown in color with light-colored rump; darker neck and head
  • No dewlap
  • Narrow, more pointed nose
  • Branched antlers (single beam with tines); in older males, antlers sweep back toward the rump
  • Social; commonly observed in small groups or herds
A bull elk with two cows and a calf in a grassy meadow

Black Bear vs. Grizzly Bear

Black bear:

  • No prominent shoulder hump
  • Straight face profile
  • Tall ears
  • Short claws (1-2 inches)

Grizzly bear:

  • Prominent shoulder hump
  • Dished face profile
  • Short, rounded ears
  • Long claws (2-4 inches)
Grizzly Bear

Never rely on size and color to determine the species of bear, as both can be misleading. Pictured below is a nearly black-colored grizzly bear. For additional training resources on identifying bear species, check out this link.

Black-colored grizzly bear

Yes, this is a grizzly bear — albeit a nearly all-black colored one.

Why it matters

Cases of misidentification result in the harvest of animals that were not intended to be harvested.

Hunting seasons and rules are set using the best information available to ensure hunting, trapping, and fishing remain available to future generations. While a few cases of misidentification may not negatively affect a wildlife population, more widespread occurrences can.

In addition, cases of misidentification may result in citations being issued, which negatively impacts the sportsmen involved. It is the responsibility of hunters to correctly identify their target species and know when and where hunting for that species is allowed. Make sure to review the 2026 Idaho Big Game Season and Rules brochure so you are in the know.

For more information or if you have questions, please contact the your local Fish and Game Regional office.

Prop 1 Language Includes Supremacy Clause; Requires Idaho Courts to Favor Abortion

0

(Stop Prop 1 Campaign Press Release, October 8, 2026)

Boise, ID – Idaho voters wondering if Proposition 1 is the moderate abortion measure its proponents claim, or a radical measure out of touch with most Idahoans’ views on abortion, need look no further than the initiative’s own text.

A crucial clause buried near the end of Prop 1 instructs courts exactly how to interpret its
provisions. It doesn’t call for a balanced, cautious, or neutral reading. It commands a liberal one.

THE LANGUAGE: PROP 1, SECTION 39-803

Prop 1 contains two provisions that, together, function as a supremacy clause – subordinating all existing Idaho law, and pre-programming the outcome of every future legal dispute:

“The provisions of this chapter are to be liberally construed in favor of reproductive
freedom
…and are intended to control over any other section of Idaho Code.“

WHAT IT MEANS: TWO RULES THAT WORK TOGETHER

The first part of that sentence is a judicial instruction: when a court interprets any provision of Prop 1, it must resolve every ambiguity in favor of more abortion – not in favor of balance, and not in favor of the state’s interest in protecting life. The most permissive reading of Prop 1 is, by law, the required one.

The second part of the sentence is a legal override: Prop 1, if passed, supersedes every
conflicting provision in Idaho Code. Any existing law that limits, qualifies or moderates Prop 1’s reach is immediately subordinated. The Idaho Legislature cannot repair, narrow or walk back the measure’s extremes without triggering immediate legal challenge under the measure’s own language.

Together, these two provisions accomplish something no ordinary statute does: they write the outcome of future court battles into the law itself. Supporters of Prop 1 aren’t just asking Idaho voters to pass an abortion measure. They are asking voters to pre-authorize the most liberal possible judicial reading of it – permanently.

HOW THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE AMPLIFIES PROP 1’S THREE MOST EXTREME PROVISIONS

1. Late-Term Abortion: The Most Liberal Reading Wins

Prop 1 redefines fetal viability to require survival without extraordinary medical measures – a definition that, under conventional medical understanding, would push the permissible window for abortion well into the seventh and eighth month of pregnancy. Babies at 24 to 28 weeks who survive only with NICU support would not be legally 11viable11 under Prop 1’s standard.

When that definition is challenged in court, the liberal construction mandate controls: courts must read it as broadly as possible in favor of abortion access. The narrowest possible interpretation of the late-term window – the reading that would most restrict abortion – is precisely what the Supremacy Clause forbids. And if the Legislature tries to step in and define “extraordinary medical measures” more precisely? The control over any other section of Idaho Code provision will be waiting.

2. Parental Consent: Existing Law Is Overridden

Idaho Code § 18-609A currently requires written parental consent before a physician may perform an abortion on an unemancipated minor. Prop 1 grants the right to abortion to “every person” – with no age exception, no parental consent requirement, and no judicial bypass process mandated.

Does that language override § 18-609A? Under Prop 1’s Supremacy Clause, the initiative controls over any other section of Idaho Code – which is exactly what § 18-609A is. And any residual ambiguity must be resolved liberally in favor of reproductive freedom. For a minor seeking an abortion without her parents’ knowledge, those two rules point in one direction: the consent requirement falls.

3. Provider Immunity: The Broadest Shield Prevails

Prop 1 grants sweeping immunity – professional, civil and criminal – to anyone who performs, assists, advises, or refers for an abortion protected under the measure. No licensing board consequences. No malpractice lawsuit. No criminal accountability.

The scope of that immunity will inevitably be litigated. When it is, the liberal construction
mandate answers the question before it’s asked: courts must read the immunity provision as broadly as possible, in favor of the providers seeking its protection. Unlike virtually every other medical procedure in Idaho – where physicians face accountability for negligent or illegal conduct – Prop 1 places abortion in a legally privileged category. The Supremacy Clause ensures that privilege is interpreted as expansively as the language will allow.

THIS IS NOT JUST A LOOPHOLE. IT IS THE DESIGN.

“The drafters of Prop 1 did not stumble into this language,” said Stop Prop 1 Communications Director Mary Strow. “They chose it deliberately. A moderately worded initiative would not need a supremacy clause. A measure intended to simply restore pre-Dobbs norms would not need to declare that its provisions control over every other Idaho law. A balanced proposal would not need to instruct courts to resolve every close question as liberally as possible in favor of one side.”

Those who wrote Prop 1 knew that their measure – with its novel viability definition, its
elimination of parental consent, and its sweeping immunity for providers – would face legal
challenges. Their answer was to write the outcome of those challenges into the initiative itself. When in doubt, go further. When it’s close, go liberal. When the Legislature tries to moderate it, we already control.

Prop 1 doesn’t just change Idaho’s abortion laws. It installs a permanent instruction to Idaho’s courts: when in doubt, rule in favor of more abortion, not less. The initiative says so itself – in the plain language Idaho voters will never see in the ballot summary – and in a word, that tells you exactly where it stands.

About the Stop Prop 1 Campaign

Too Extreme for Idaho PAC is the organization behind Stop Prop 1, the campaign opposing Proposition 1 on Idaho’s November ballot. For more information or to join the campaign, visit: www.StopProp1.org.

Idaho Jobs Poised To Grow More Than Four Times Faster Than National Average

0
(Photo Credit: Karyn Simmons)

(Governor’s Office Press Release, October 8, 2026)

Boise, Idaho – Governor Brad Little commented today on the news from the Idaho Department of Labor that Idaho jobs are expected to outpace the national average through 2034.

“Idaho continues to stand out as a place where people want to live, work, raise a family, and build a business. These projections are another strong sign that our economy is positioned for continued opportunity.

“Idaho’s projected employment growth of 1.3% a year through 2034 is more than four times the national forecast. We have now outpaced the nation in employment growth for 11 consecutive years, and this forecast shows that momentum is expected to continue.

“Our job is to make sure Idaho is ready for that growth. That means investing in education and workforce training, expanding opportunities like LAUNCH and apprenticeships, building the infrastructure our communities need, and keeping Idaho a place where employers can invest and grow without unnecessary government barriers.

“Idaho’s success comes from the hard work of Idahoans and the strength of our businesses and communities. We will keep building on that success so our children and grandchildren have even more opportunities to succeed right here at home,” Governor Little said.

NEWS RELEASE FROM IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF LABOR:

Idaho expected to see annual employment growth over national average through 2034

Idaho’s labor market is expected to continue its significant expansion through the end of the decade, with a projected employment growth rate of 1.3% per year and a total employment count reaching 1,028,760 by 2034. These new long-term employment projections are estimates from the Idaho Department of Labor and cover the period from 2024-2034.

Idaho’s long-term projected growth rate of 1.3% is significantly higher than the national forecast. The most recent projections from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics anticipate a national growth rate of approximately 0.3% annually — less than one fourth of the projected growth rate for Idaho.

These projections are consistent with Idaho’s record of strong job creation in recent years, including rapid growth from 2010-2020, and an economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic that was among the strongest in the nation.

As seen in Figure 1 below, Idaho has consistently been a leader in job growth among the states, with its growth rate exceeding the national rate 11 years in a row, starting in 2011.

The state’s strong growth projections are partly based on Idaho’s relatively high population growth. With population gains mostly stagnant across the country, individual states like Idaho are finding success by attracting new residents from other, higher-cost states.

From 2010-2020, Idaho ranked second behind Utah in population growth. For the rest of the coming decade, the department projects population growth to remain high for Idaho, driving a significant demand in a variety of sectors, especially new home construction, healthcare and consumer services.

Of Idaho’s top 50 jobs, more than half are in either construction or healthcare (14 jobs each). The Construction and Extraction occupational group has the highest projected growth, with more than 13,000 new jobs expected by 2034. Similarly, the Healthcare Support occupational group is projected to increase by 12,500 new jobs.

While occupational projections estimate the staffing requirements of each industry, industry projections forecast the composition of Idaho’s economy by business sector (outlined in Figure 2 below).

Just like with occupational growth, the Healthcare and Social Assistance industry is expected to experience one of the greatest gains in employment (+34,000) and is projected to grow the fastest through 2034, with an annual growth rate of 2.4%. This is due to the state’s continued aging population trend.

Idaho’s Construction industry is also forecasted to see strong employment growth (+14,700) as a result of an increasing population reducing inventory, raising prices and creating a high demand for new building construction.

An ongoing societal shift from brick-and-mortar retail to e-commerce is expected to drive job gains away from Retail Trade (+0.7% per year) toward Transportation and Warehousing (+1.6% per year), which includes fulfillment centers and delivery services. While Retail Trade is traditionally a far larger sector of the economy, employment growth in Transportation and Warehousing jobs is projected to be much faster by percentage growth.

Strong gains in Idaho’s Manufacturing jobs are also expected to continue, with roughly 8,500 new jobs expected by 2034. Within this large and diverse sector, nearly half the job growth is expected in two specific industries of high importance — Food Manufacturing (+3,900 jobs) and Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing (+1,250 jobs).

For more information, visit the Idaho Department of Labor’s occupational and industry projections webpage.

figure1

Figure 1. Annual employment growth, Idaho and U.S., 2010-2034

Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Idaho Department of Labor

figure2

Figure 2: Idaho industry projections, 2024-2034

Source: Idaho Department of Labor

Guest Column – ID GOP Chairwoman Dorothy Moon: Idaho’s Future Depends On Your Vote

0

October 9, 2026 (Cover image credit: IDGOP FB)

Idaho’s Future Depends On Your Vote

By: Dorothy Moon, IDGOP Chairwoman

Dorothy Moon, Chairwoman of the Idaho Republican Party

We’ve been here before.

Less than four weeks before an election that could change the course of our nation’s future, all the talking heads are telling you to give up. It’s over, they say. Democrats will win the House, and probably the Senate too. President Trump will be impeached, and the MAGA agenda is dead.

Remember when the same talking heads told us that Donald Trump had zero chance of defeating Hillary Clinton in 2016? Or that Kamala Harris and her coconut trees were sure to win the White House in 2024?

I want to remind you that polls don’t matter. Prediction markets don’t matter. Opinions from analysts and commentators on TV don’t matter. The only thing that matters is voters casting ballots.

That means you!

I’m sure you’ve grown tired of pundits calling the next election the most important in history. But there’s a certain truth to it. Each election has the potential to shape everything that comes after and change the world that your children and grandchildren will inherit.

Imagine where we would be if Hillary Clinton had won in 2016, or Kamala Harris in 2024. Open borders, skyrocketing inflation, and almost certainly an Orwellian crackdown on free speech like we’ve seen in Britain these past few years.

We avoided that future because you bothered to vote.

Midterm elections are no less important. Right now, Sen. Jim Risch is the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and has an open door to the President of the United States. As part of a Republican majority, he helps confirm President Trump’s executive and judicial appointees.

A Democratic Senate would shut that down on Day 1.

The same thing goes for the House. Congressmen Mike Simpson and Russ Fulcher have tremendous influence, and under the leadership of Speaker Mike Johnson, they have passed every good bill on the table and made sure to fully fund President Trump’s agenda. A Democratic House would not only put a stop to that, but would launch endless partisan witch hunts instead.

Under the leadership of Gov. Brad Little, Attorney General Raúl Labrador, and the rest of our Republican elected officials, Idaho has prospered economically—with low unemployment and high wages—and become a place where traditional values are cherished, not denigrated. Republican leadership in Idaho has cut taxes, cut regulations, protected women’s sports and spaces, and defended unborn life.

That’s ultimately due to you—the Republican voter who takes your civic responsibility seriously. Voting is not just about choosing one candidate or another, or deciding which propositions to approve and which to reject. Voting is an expression of hope for the future of our state and our nation.

I don’t care whether you vote early, absentee, or on Election Day, so long as you vote. Our future depends on you!

Guest Columnist Idaho Senator Christy Zito: Democrat Win???

0

October 6, 2026

Democrat Win???

ID Senator Christy Zito (photo credit: Christy Zito)

Idaho Families Have Waited Long Enough

The Democratic Party did not discover Idaho’s grocery tax.

They are leveraging it as the politically powerful issue that it is.

Idaho families have been asking for grocery-tax repeal for decades—long before I ever served in the Legislature and long before I became a precinct committeewoman.

In 2017, Representative Ron Nate carried legislation to repeal Idaho’s 6% sales tax on groceries. It passed the House 51–19 and the Senate 25–10.

Then Governor Butch Otter vetoed it. The Idaho Supreme Court reviewed his veto by omission and ruled for the Governor. Not surprised.

I know this issue personally.

I have tried to get hearings on repealing the grocery tax. I have watched the issue be ignored. And when I used the proper legislative procedure to attach a grocery-tax repeal amendment to an income-tax reduction bill, I felt the wrath of the Senate Republican Caucus.

That tells me something.

This has never been about whether Idaho can afford to repeal the grocery tax.

It has been about whether those in power are willing to give up the revenue and give the conservative wing of the Republican Party a win, and give families of Idaho a loss.

Today Idaho still charges a 6% sales tax on groceries. Instead, those in power in the legislature have chosen to give taxpayers a grocery-tax credit. They are essentially collecting your hard-earned money at the checkout and expecting you to file taxes. Even more insulting, if you want a pittance more, you keep all of your receipts and itemize them for the State Tax Commission, and you may get a little more of YOUR MONEY BACK.

That isn’t repeal.

And I have heard, firsthand, the argument that the grocery tax is necessary because it allows Idaho to collect money from tourists and people here illegally.

I will say this:

Idaho families should not be punished at the grocery store because politicians don’t listen.

The people hurt most by the tax on food, a tax that is not a luxury tax, but a tax on something that nobody can choose not to buy, are families and seniors living on fixed or limited incomes.

Food isn’t a luxury.

You can’t put it off until next month.

You cannot decide not to eat because inflation is high.

And you shouldn’t have to wait until tax season to get some of your own money back.

Now the Idaho Democratic Party has formally embraced repealing the grocery tax.

Let’s not rewrite history.

This issue did not belong to them yesterday, and it doesn’t belong to them today. It belongs to Idaho taxpayers.

Republican leaders need to answer a very simple question:

If Idaho has enough money to cut other taxes repeatedly, why can’t we finally stop taxing the food Idaho families have to put on their tables?

After all these years, I’m tired of excuses.

I’m tired of political games.

And I’m tired of watching politicians take credit for tax relief while refusing to eliminate the taxes that families actually feel every week.

Idaho families have waited long enough.

It’s time to stop talking about grocery-tax relief and repeal the grocery tax.

God bless,

Senator Christy Zito
District 8
Protecting Freedom for Future Generations

P.S. If you haven’t already, subscribe to my Substack (zitoforidaho.substack.com) for straight talk from the Capitol and updates you won’t get from the mainstream press. Let’s stay connected and stay strong.

Pocatello: American Legion Steak Dinner is TONIGHT, October 9, 5-7 PM

0

October 9, 2026

The American Legion’s monthly steak night will be held this evening, October 9, from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., at the Bannock County Veterans Memorial Building, 300 N. Johnson Avenue in Pocatello.

For $20 per person ($12 per person for the medium meal) you can enjoy a hand-cut ribeye steak cooked over a charcoal fire, baked potato, assorted vegetables, baked beans, and their famous apple crisp with ice cream.

Steak Night is held on the 2nd Friday of every month.  All proceeds help support programs sponsored by Pocatello’s American Legion Post 4.

HHS Launches Agency-Wide Actions to Strengthen Vaccine Injury Research, Reporting, and Patient Care

0

(U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, October 8, 2026)

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) this week launched a series of actions to strengthen how the federal government identifies, documents, investigates, and responds to health problems reported following vaccination, with a focus on improving patient care and generating better evidence about potential vaccine-related injuries.

To address health problems Americans report after vaccinations, HHS:

  • Opened a new National Institutes of Health (NIH) clinic dedicated to studying and caring for patients experiencing health problems following vaccination;
  • Proposed reimbursing physicians for reporting suspected vaccine-related injuries to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) through a new Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) policy, bringing vaccine reporting in Medicare in line with typical Medicare reimbursement policies;
  • Will require electronic health records to capture vaccine-related adverse events so that information can follow patients across the health care system; and
  • Is modernizing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) VAERS to make reporting simpler and improve the tools available to researchers and medical professionals investigating potential safety signals.

“We must listen to patients and families who report vaccine injuries—not dismiss or gaslight them,” said HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. “President Trump and I are building a health system that takes them seriously, follows the evidence, and uses what we learn to make vaccines safer. This is how we earn back trust in our public health institutions.”

NIH Opens Clinic for Patient Care and Research

On October 5, NIH opened a new clinic dedicated to studying and caring for patients experiencing health problems following vaccination. HHS and NIH leaders marked the opening with a ribbon-cutting ceremony at NIH’s Bethesda campus.

The clinic brings specialized patient care and scientific investigation together, allowing NIH clinicians and researchers to evaluate patients, study their experiences, investigate potential causes, and identify better approaches to care. By connecting patients directly with clinicians and researchers, NIH will expand access to evaluation and care while advancing scientific understanding of health problems reported following vaccination.

CMS Proposes Reimbursing Physicians for VAERS Reporting

For the first time, CMS has proposed reimbursing physicians for the time they spend submitting reports of suspected vaccine-related injuries to VAERS, bringing vaccine reporting in Medicare in line with typical Medicare reimbursement policies.

VAERS relies on reports from health care professionals, patients, caregivers, vaccine manufacturers, and others to help identify potential vaccine safety concerns. CMS proposes the reimbursement policy to reduce barriers to physician reporting and encourage health care professionals to document suspected adverse events following vaccination.

Electronic Health Records to Capture Vaccine-Related Adverse Events

Federal health information technology standards overseen by the HHS Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology will now require electronic health records to capture vaccine-related adverse events so that this information can follow patients across the health care system.

The requirement will give health care professionals a more complete picture of a patient’s medical history and reduce the need for patients to repeatedly recount the same information when receiving care from different providers.

CDC Modernizing VAERS

CDC is modernizing VAERS to make adverse-event reporting simpler, more accessible, and easier to use.

In August, CDC solicited bids for a new contract to overhaul the system. On September 28, CDC announced a new contract to make VAERS accessible on mobile devices and improve the tools available to researchers and medical professionals investigating potential safety signals. Earlier this year, CDC also added a VAERS QR code to Vaccine Information Statements provided to parents and patients for each vaccine administered.

Together, these Department-wide actions will connect patient care, physician reporting, medical records, clinical research, and federal safety monitoring. They will help HHS better identify and investigate potential vaccine injuries, improve care for patients, and use what it learns to strengthen vaccine safety.