Tuesday, February 3, 2026
Home Blog

ID Senator Glenneda Zuiderveld: ARPA 4.0? Idaho’s Rural Health Grant Raises Familiar Red Flags

0

February 1, 2026

ARPA 4.0? Idaho’s Rural Health Grant Raises Familiar Red Flags
Government by Task Force: Idaho’s Quiet Shift

ID Senator Glenneda Zuiderveld (Photo Credit: Glenneda Zuiderveld)

Is the Rural Health Transformation Program simply ARPA 4.0?

This program was authorized by the federal “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” which allocates $50 billion nationwide, at a time when our nation carries $38 trillion in debt. Idaho alone is slated to receive nearly $1 billion over five years.

The Idaho Department of Health and Welfare and Governor Brad Little determined, on their own, that Idaho “needs” this funding. The application was completed and the grant approved without any vote of the Legislature.

In further neglect of the constitutional responsibilities vested in the legislative branch, the Governor then created a task force, comprised largely of unelected officials, to decide how, when, and where this money will be spent.

This program also adds 13 full-time temporary government positions. We are told these positions last only five years, but we have seen this before. Positions created with ARPA funding were labeled “temporary” as well, yet many remain today long after the money is gone.

In short, the executive branch is sidestepping the legislative branch, operating under the mindset of “we know this is wrong, but we’ll do it anyway and ask for forgiveness later.”


When Senate and House leadership saw what was taking place, they responded by creating their own task force for legislative oversight. But do two wrongs make a right?

Both task forces hand-pick their members, once again bypassing the germane committees, the Appropriations Committees, and the Legislature as a whole, bodies that operate with greater transparency and are elected by the people, not appointed by the Governor or leadership.

We are in session right now to do the people’s work. If that means longer hours, then so be it. If it means working late into the night and missing lobbyist dinners, then that is what we do. That is the job.

Creating additional task forces only increases time, costs taxpayers more money, and adds unnecessary workload to legislative services, rather than addressing the issue through the proper constitutional process.


Why I share this….

I share this because I was blindsided during a meeting with Juliet Charron, Acting Director of the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, while discussing my concerns about the Rural Health Fund grant. My concern centered on how the federal grant defines “rural.” Under that definition, nearly all of Idaho is considered rural, which means large hospital systems that already dominate Idaho’s health care market would be positioned to receive a substantial share of the funding.

I also asked a critical question: What happens when the money is gone in five years?

During that same meeting, I was informed that the task force was scheduled to meet that afternoon at 2:30 p.m. I asked how that was possible when the Legislature had not yet voted on the appropriation or the enabling language. I also asked who created the task force.

I then checked the legislative website and confirmed that the meeting was indeed scheduled and that the committee had already been appointed. I personally approached those selected on the Senate side, and every one of them was unaware of their appointment. They were just as surprised as I was. In the rush to assemble the task force, leadership failed to notify those they had appointed.

When I attended the meeting, the room was packed with lobbyists, agency staff, hospital administrators, and health care executives. It was striking that legislators assigned to the task force knew nothing about the meeting, yet all of these interests did.

I subsequently sent a letter to all 105 legislators, expressing my disappointment and requesting answers. Only one Representative, who was not in leadership, responded. Leadership’s response was silence… crickets.

Eventually, the Chairman of the Task Force, Representative Redman, contacted me to offer an explanation. I was still not satisfied with either the explanation or the lack of response.

As a result, I asked JFAC Chairman Tanner for permission to ask a question prior to our presentations. I formally asked who created the task force, when it was created, how much notice was provided before the meeting held on Wednesday the 29th at 2:30 p.m., and I made it clear that I had unresolved questions and expected answers on the record.

 


What is the solution?

Idaho should adopt policy that prevents the executive branch and its appointed agencies from independently applying for large federal grants that create long-term obligations.

The Idaho Constitution assigns budgeting authority and oversight to the Legislative Branch. Those decisions must start there, not be presented after commitments are already made.

Let’s learn from the mistakes made with the ARPA-Covid 23 billion, money that we stole from our grandchildren.

Our children and grandchildren deserve better. They should not inherit a $38 trillion and growing, national debt because we chose convenience over courage, or comfort over responsibility. They should not be left holding the bill because today’s leaders wanted a smoother path or feared the political cost of saying no.

We also need to stop making excuses.
The argument that “if Idaho doesn’t take the money, another state will” is not sound reasoning. By that logic, any harmful choice can be justified. It’s the same flawed thinking as saying, “I took the drugs because if I didn’t, someone else would.” That doesn’t make the choice right, it just avoids accountability.

Additional Links

ARPA Bill S1204

“Idaho has received nearly $23 billion in funds related to COVID and the public health emergency over the last few years, including money for individuals and businesses.” IFF-Fred Birnbaum

Rural Definition

Rural Health Grant

Guest Columnist Brian Almon: This is Why You Should Talk to Your Legislators

0
(Image Credit: Gem State Chronicle)

January 30, 2026 (Cover Image Credit: Gem State Chronicle)

This is Why You Should Talk to Your Legislators
You really can make a difference.

By: Brian Almon

On Wednesday morning, the Senate State Affairs Committee took testimony from Idaho Human Rights Commission (IHRC) Vice President Estella Zamora, who was nominated by Gov. Brad Little to serve an additional term as a commissioner. Zamora’s social media history revealed constant agitation against immigration enforcement, accusing President Trump of racism, labeling his supporters as cowards, and calling for resistance against ICE.

I discussed the appointment with Matt Edwards on Idaho Signal later that day:

I heard from quite a few readers who emailed members of the Senate State Affairs Committee asking them to reject Zamora’s reappointment. The issue went viral on social media as well, with the Idaho Signal segment garnering nearly 9,000 views, while my initial tweet from Wednesday morning reached 18,500.

By Thursday, I was hearing rumors that the nomination was being put on ice, and on Friday evening, Senate President Pro Tempore Kelly Anthon confirmed it:

Screenshot

When our elected officials are moving in what we believe is the wrong direction, we have several options as participants in the Republic:

  • Ignore it and hope for the best
  • Make a big fuss online
  • Threaten a primary challenge
  • Call them up and engage in respectful dialogue

One of these has a chance of success—can you guess which one?

Ignorance can be bliss if you’re not concerned with the state of our society. But if you don’t want the IHRC to be run by far-left anti-ICE activists, your tax dollars going to illegal aliens, or public school curricula infused with radical gender ideology, then you need to speak up.

Complaining on social media is easy. It takes just a few seconds, and then you’re back to doomscrolling—bonus points if you get the dopamine hit of likes and reposts. But what did you really accomplish? The internet is full of outrage, a sea of noise with few signals to be found.

Threatening primary challenges is even more ridiculous. I remember when the cause of the day on conservative social media was the leadership vote in the U.S. Senate. Numerous posters threatened to support a primary challenger against Sen. Jim Risch if he didn’t back their preferred candidate. Well, here we are: there are at least two such challengers, but neither has much of a chance. It’s very easy to issue an empty threat on X; it’s much harder to put in the work of raising money and campaigning against a powerful incumbent. Most longtime incumbents likely learned years ago to ignore empty rhetoric like that.

Calling or emailing your elected representatives might not always get results, but it has the best chance of success. Even if you can’t change their mind on one issue, you can build a trusted connection for future issues down the road.

Idaho legislators hear a lot of voices on any given day. Professional lobbyists jockey to make their clients’ case, executive branch staffers offer opinions, and legislative leadership works to ensure certain outcomes. If you’re not taking the time to talk to your elected officials, someone else is—and you can’t then blame them for not doing what you want.

Obviously, there are times when it makes sense to replace an elected legislator with someone closer to your values. In that case, you should find a competent challenger (maybe that’s you!) and put as many resources as possible toward getting that person elected. That means raising money, knocking doors, and doing the legwork to get it done.

Either way, sitting on the couch is not an option.

The furor over Estella Zamora’s reappointment shows that our republican form of government can still function if you’re willing to put in the work. I think most elected officials genuinely want to hear from their constituents. After all, they want to stay in office, which means knowing the mood of their voters on any given issue. If all they see are the usual suspects screaming on social media, they may discount it. But if they hear calm, measured perspectives from dozens of citizens, they might think twice.

Gov. Little makes hundreds of appointments each year. Even with multiple staff members, it’s possible that something like Estella Zamora’s social media rhetoric was missed—or perhaps it was deemed unimportant. Whatever the case, it’s up to us as citizens of Idaho to inform our governor and legislative leaders of issues like this. It doesn’t hurt to start with the benefit of the doubt. Rather than assuming everything you disagree with is part of a malicious plot, give your lawmaker a call and ask for their perspective. You might even be able to tell them something they didn’t know. And even if you still disagree in the end, a respectful dialogue is rarely wasted.

Keeping an anti-ICE ideologue off the Idaho Human Rights Commission is a small victory in the grand scheme of things, but it’s a worthwhile one. Let’s use dialogue and persuasion to build on this and keep winning for the people of Idaho.

Editor’s note:  This article originally appeared in the Gem State Chronicle.  I encourage our readers to visit their website and consider subscribing.  Find this and other informative articles at the Gem State Chronicle here: About – Gem State Chronicle

Idaho Secretary of State – Bowling Together: Reflections from the NASS Conference

0

(Idaho Secretary of State’s Office Press Release, February 2, 2026)

I laced up my bowling shoes in the White House basement, regretted not taking high school German at a reception with a foreign ambassador, and came face-to-face with a collection tied to a personal family treasure, all during my recent trip to Washington, D.C., for the National Association of Secretaries of State conference.

Coming Together at NASS

The semi-annual NASS conference is an invaluable opportunity to connect with Secretaries from around the country. Though we have profound differences, we grapple with many of the same challenges in this complex space, from cybersecurity to elections to business regulation and beyond. These conversations matter, and they reinforce how much we can learn from one another.

Bowling in the White House Basement

One memorable highlight of the trip was an evening at the historic Truman Bowling Alley, tucked away in the White House basement. Originally a gift to President Truman for his 63rd birthday, the two-lane alley has a timeless, almost surreal quality to it. Sharing a game and a beer with a few fellow Secretaries in a place where presidents have bowled for decades felt both humbling and extraordinary. Strikes really do hit differently when you’re rolling a ball stamped with the official White House seal.

History, Family, and America 250

Another standout moment was a visit to the National Archives, where we received a sneak peek of the upcoming America 250 exhibit. As part of the America 250 Advisory Committee, I’m excited about the plans taking shape to mark our nation’s 250th birthday here in Idaho.

That visit also turned into a personal moment for me. My father, a lifelong history enthusiast (yes, I’m a fourth-generation nerd), owns an 1820s reproduction of the Declaration of Independence commissioned by John Quincy Adams to preserve the original, fading document. As I was sharing that story with Alaska’s Secretary of State, we turned a corner and came face to face with the very stone engraving used to produce my father’s copy. It was one of those unexpected moments that reminds you how history connects generations. I’m looking forward to sharing that document with Idahoans across the state through partnerships with our universities in the months ahead.

Building Relationships Beyond Our Borders

We also had the opportunity to attend a reception with the German Ambassador to the United States. It was a valuable reminder that part of this job includes building and maintaining relationships beyond our borders. Those connections matter, and they reinforce how state-level work often plays a role on a much larger stage.

Idaho’s Seat at the Table

Every time I visit Washington, D.C., I’m reminded that Idaho’s voice carries weight. We may be a small state by population, but we consistently punch above our weight, and others notice. That’s something Idahoans can be proud of.

Phil McGrane

ABOUT SECRETARY PHIL McGRANE

Phil McGrane was elected Idaho’s twenty-eighth Secretary of State and took office on January 2, 2023. McGrane served as elected Clerk of Ada County from 2019-2022.McGrane holds a bachelor’s degree in philosophy, a juris doctorate, and a Master of Public Administration. As a fourth-generation Idahoan, Phil has dedicated his career to making elections in the state of Idaho accessible, secure and transparent.

Applications Are Now Open for Spring Turkey Controlled Hunts

0

(Idaho Fish and Game Press Release, January 26, 2026)

Hunters can see a full list of the 2026 spring turkey controlled hunts below. The updated seasons and rules booklets will be posted in early February.

Turkey hunters looking to apply for 2026 spring controlled turkey hunts can apply from Feb. 1 to March 1. See the full list of 2026 spring controlled hunts below.

NOTE: During the January 2026 Commission meeting (watch here), the Idaho Fish and Game Commission approved the 2026-2027 Upland Game, Turkey, and Furbearer seasons and rules, including changes to existing spring turkey controlled hunts. The full seasons and rules booklet will be posted online in early February and available at local license vendors in late February or early March.

2026 spring turkey controlled hunts - FINAL

Hunters must have a 2026 hunting license in order to apply for controlled hunts, and there is a non-refundable application fee of $6.25 for residents and $18.00 for nonresidents.

Controlled hunt applications for spring 2026 turkey close on March 1. Successful spring turkey applicants will be notified no later than March 20. Hunters with a valid email address on file will be notified of their status via email. Any leftover tags for spring turkey controlled hunts go on sale April 1.

HOW TO APPLY
  • Online: Hunters can apply through their online profile at GoOutdoorsIdaho.com.
  • In-person: Applications can be submitted at any license vendor location or at a Fish and Game office.
  • Telephone: Applications can be placed over the phone by calling 1 (800) 554-8685.

Controlled hunts are hunts with a limited number of tags allocated by a random drawing, unlike a general season hunt, which allows hunters to purchase tags over the counter. Controlled hunts are often desirable because of location and timing, and success rates are usually higher than general season hunts.

Controlled hunt tags are valid in the controlled hunt for which a hunter was drawn or in any open general hunt during the calendar year for which the tag is valid. See pages 24-25 for the list of controlled hunts. A turkey hunter may only harvest one bird per controlled hunt tag.

Junior hunters must be between the ages of 10 and 17 to participate in controlled youth hunts, but a 9-year-old may buy a junior license to apply for a controlled hunt, provided the hunter is 10 years old at the time of the hunt they are applying for.

AG Labrador Announces New Solicitor General

0

(Attorney General’s Office Press Release, February 2, 2026)

BOISE, ID — Today, Attorney General Raúl Labrador announced the promotion of Michael Zarian to become Idaho’s Solicitor General following the departure of Alan Hurst, who has served in the role since January 2024. Alan will be returning to private practice in his home state of Utah, where he was working before he joined the Attorney General’s office.

The Solicitor General leads the Office of Attorney General’s appellate litigation, representing Idaho before the U.S. Supreme Court, federal courts of appeals, and the Idaho Supreme Court in the state’s most significant constitutional and legal challenges.

Since becoming Solicitor General in January 2024, Alan Hurst has defended Idaho and its laws in the state’s most contentious litigation. Last month, he argued Little v. Hecox before the United States Supreme Court, defending Idaho’s right to protect girls’ and women’s sports from unfair participation by biological males. He has represented Idaho in cases protecting separate bathrooms and locker rooms for women, shielding youth from unproven medical treatments for gender dysphoria, and banning the distribution of obscene materials to minors. In the Ninth Circuit, he won a unanimous ruling affirming dismissal of The Satanic Temple’s challenge to Idaho’s pro-life laws, and in the Idaho Supreme Court, he successfully defended the state’s billion-dollar contract for behavioral health services.

“Alan defended some of Idaho’s most important cases with skill and conviction these last two years, especially arguing before the U.S. Supreme Court to protect women’s sports last month,” said Attorney General Labrador. “I’m grateful for his service to Idaho and wish him and his family all the best.”

Michael Zarian has served as Deputy Solicitor General since January 2024, playing a significant role in many of the office’s most consequential appeals in state and federal court. He led the team that secured reversal from the U.S. Supreme Court in M.H. v. Hamso, which addressed Idaho’s ability to decline to cover sex-transition surgeries through Medicaid. Zarian has defended Idaho’s statutes from constitutional challenges at the Idaho Supreme Court and federal courts of appeals, drafting briefs and presenting oral argument in defense of Idaho’s Parental Choice Tax Credit, Idaho’s election security laws, and the Idaho Patient Act.

An Idaho native who graduated from Eagle High School, Zarian graduated magna cum laude from Brigham Young University with a Bachelor of Science in Applied Physics with minors in Mathematics and Business Management. He obtained his law degree from the University of Chicago Law School, where he graduated Order of the Coif and with High Honors and served as a member of the University of Chicago Law Review. Following law school, Zarian clerked for the Honorable Sandra S. Ikuta on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Honorable Gregory G. Katsas on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. Before joining the Office of the Attorney General, Zarian practiced civil litigation at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP in Dallas, Texas, where he specialized in appeals and dispositive motions in high-stakes commercial cases.

“Michael has already proven himself, winning before the Idaho Supreme Court and successfully defending our laws in both state and federal courts,” said Attorney General Labrador. “He understands what’s at stake for Idaho families. The constitutional battles ahead are among the most consequential in our state’s history, and Michael is exactly the right attorney to lead my Solicitor General’s Office in that fight.”

Americans Overwhelmingly Support Deporting Criminal Illegals, Local Cooperation with ICE

0

(White House Press Release, February 2, 2026)

As Radical Left Democrats continue their reckless obstruction, two new polls resoundingly confirm President Donald J. Trump’s crackdown on illegal immigration is massively popular with the American people. From mass deportations of criminal illegal aliens to empowering ICE as they enforce our nation’s laws, Americans are rallying behind President Trump’s agenda — and Democrats’ extremism couldn’t be more out of touch.

A new poll underscores Americans’ broad agreement on the fundamentals of President Trump’s border enforcement:

  • 73% agree that entering the U.S. without permission is breaking the law.
  • 61% support deporting illegal aliens to their home countries.
  • 58% reject Democrats’ extremist calls to defund ICE — now a core position of their party.
  • 54% support ICE enforcing our nation’s federal immigration laws.

A second new poll reveals even fiercer alignment with President Trump’s decisive action to protect our communities from criminal illegal aliens:

  • A solid majority approves of President Trump’s strong response to the anti-ICE riots in Minneapolis.
  • 73% say criminal illegal aliens should be deported — with over half extending that to all illegal aliens with no lawful right to be here.
  • 67% want state and local officials to cooperate with federal authorities to deport criminal illegal aliens (including 64% of independents).
  • 67% say local jails should hand over criminal illegal aliens to federal authorities for swift deportation (backed by 62% of independents and even 50% of Democrats).
  • 60% see Democrats as actively encouraging resistance to ICE officers simply trying to do their jobs and keep Americans safe.
  • 57% oppose elected officials stoking chaos by urging defiance against ICE.

These results expose the extremism of the Radical Left: While Democrats fuel lawlessness and chaos, everyday Americans stand squarely with President Trump to deport criminals, reclaim sovereignty, and restore safety.

The Trump Administration will not relent in its pursuit of secure borders, safe streets, and an agenda that puts America First.

Share Pocatello’s History: Community Photo Contest Now Open

0

(City of Pocatello Press Release, February 2, 2026; Cover photo credit: Bannock County Historical Museum FB)

The City of Pocatello, in coordination with the Historic Preservation Commission, is inviting the community to participate in a new history photo contest by submitting historic photos that capture Pocatello’s people, places, events, and neighborhoods.

The contest begins today and will run through May 31, allowing time for entries to be submitted and shared with the community. Submitted photos must not be copyrighted or part of a museum or archival collection unless written permission from the rights holder is provided.

Community members are encouraged to dig through photo boxes, albums, and family collections. City staff can also scan original photos at City Hall, 911 North 7th Avenue, for those who do not have digital copies.

The top three photos will be selected by the public based on Facebook likes and will each receive City of Pocatello swag. Selected images may also be featured on the City’s website, social media platforms, or in printed City materials, helping tell the story of Pocatello — The One and Only.

To submit a photo or learn more about the contest, visit: pocatello.seamlessdocs.com/f/POCphotograph

In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, it is the policy of the City of Pocatello to offer its public programs, services, and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to everyone, including those with disabilities.  If you are disabled and require an accommodation, please contact Skyler Beebe with two (2) business days’ advance notice at sbeebe@pocatello.gov; 208.234.6248; or 5815 South 5th Avenue, Pocatello, Idaho.  Advance notification within this guideline will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility.

INL Aids in Securing America’s Critical Materials Supply Chain

0

(Idaho National Laboratory Press Release, February 2, 2026; Cover image credit: INL FB)

The Idaho National Laboratory (INL) is addressing one of the nation’s most urgent challenges: securing a reliable domestic supply of critical materials. These materials are essential for technologies such as smartphones, satellites and advanced weapons systems that drive the economy and ensure national security.

“Critical materials and metals are crucial to our daily lives; we rely on them,” said Travis McLing, a subsurface research scientist at INL. “However, we depend heavily on foreign entities, jeopardizing our technological leadership, modern lifestyle and national security.”

To address supply chain vulnerabilities, INL uses its geoscience expertise and advanced technologies to develop more efficient methods for locating, extracting and domestically processing critical materials.

INL’s geoscience research supports executive orders aimed at expanding U.S. critical material production to strengthen national security, energy independence and industrial competitiveness.

“With a seven-decade history of fundamental geoscience research, INL has been, and will continue to be, pivotal in helping the nation meet its energy and strategic missions,” said McLing.

Geoscience capabilities

INL geoscientists study the location and distribution of critical materials and analyze how to extract them efficiently. These materials can come from mining, recycled electronic waste (such as computers and cellphones), industrial byproducts, geothermal brines, phosphate and mining waste. INL researchers explore every potential source to lay the groundwork for more strategic and efficient resource development.

“We’ve embraced the national lab charge to do hard things, and we have a proven history of working successfully and safely in challenging environments,” said McLing. “For example, many ore bodies contain elements like arsenic, mercury or naturally occurring radioactive materials that complicate mining and research. Yet we’re able to study them safely and extract the critical materials.”

INL’s geology team examines how different materials are bonded in ore bodies, including both desired elements and hazardous ones. Once these bonds are understood, the information is passed to separation chemists who develop more efficient and environmentally friendly methods for isolating the desired materials.

“Many organizations lack the specialized expertise in advanced geochemistry or the in-house capabilities required to extract minerals from diverse earth materials,” said Trevor Atkinson, another subsurface research scientist at INL. “At INL, we bridge these gaps through targeted research and innovative problem solving.”

1
INL is finding ways to improve critical material extraction from many sources, including ores like these. (Photo credit: INL)

INL’s capabilities

Advanced characterization tools

The Microscopy and Characterization Suite uses powerful tools like electron microscopes and X-ray systems to identify and map critical minerals at very small scales. Understanding the exact makeup and structure of these minerals helps improve extraction methods, making mining strategies more efficient and effective.

Next-generation exploration

Scientists at INL use advanced software to integrate geologic, geophysical and geochemical data to build high-resolution models of underground formations. This process helps identify resource-rich zones in the U.S. while reducing exploration time, cost and environmental impact.

AI and digital twins

INL uses artificial intelligence (AI) and digital twin technology to speed up mineral discovery and optimize production. Digital twins are virtual replicas of mineral systems and processing operations that allow scientists to test and refine strategies before implementation. AI models trained on large geoscience datasets help predict deposit locations, identify patterns and support real-time decision making. These tools improve accuracy, reduce risk and support more efficient mineral extraction.

Simulating real-world conditions

The Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) is an advanced software tool that helps scientists and engineers simulate complex physical processes such as heat, mechanical stress and fluid flow. Its versatile modeling capabilities apply to fields like nuclear engineering, energy systems, environmental science, materials science and geoscience. Using MOOSE can optimize mining practices to maximize critical material extraction, leading to more efficient and cost-effective operations.

Smarter processing and recovery

INL is working on increasing the efficiency of comminution — the process of grinding and crushing rocks to a more manageable size — and beneficiation, which improves ore quality by separating valuable materials from rock. INL’s efforts make these processes more efficient, maximize the recovery of desired materials, reducing the energy needed and making domestic production more economically viable.

Geometallurgy of rare earth elements for novel refinement

INL is exploring where rare earth elements and naturally occurring radioactive materials are found within rock formations in the U.S. The geoscience team conducts experiments and uses machine learning to find ways to more efficiently extract and remove rare earth elements from mineral ores.

Uranium studies collaboration

INL is collaborating with UR-Energy at the Lost Creek uranium mining site. The INL team uses portable X-rays to study the chemical and biological conditions of the site before, during and after mining. The team is also creating AI tools to generate detailed underground maps based on drilling data. This work will make the U.S. uranium supply chain, which is essential for America’s nuclear energy needs, more reliable and efficient.

Looking ahead

INL continues to innovate in the field of critical materials research. The laboratory’s efforts are pivotal in ensuring a stable and secure supply of these essential resources. Our capabilities and expertise allow us to contribute to the Minerals to Materials Supply Chain Facility (METALLIC), a multi-laboratory initiative to accelerate the development and commercialization of technologies for critical materials extraction and production. INL’s role includes supporting research in separation science, artificial intelligence, pilot-scale processing, feedstock beneficiation, and critical material extraction and separation. This work is helping to establish a secure, domestic supply chain for critical materials.

“INL benefits from its proximity to the Intermountain West region, which is rich in critical materials,” said McLing. “Our research teams are collaborative; we share what we learn to improve the work of all our teams and, by extension, the economic value and efficiencies for our partners.”

By Brandon Hallmark, INL Communications

About Idaho National Laboratory
Battelle Energy Alliance manages INL for the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy. INL is the nation’s center for nuclear energy research and development, and also performs research in each of DOE’s strategic goal areas: energy, national security, science and the environment. For more information, visit www.inl.gov. Follow us on social media: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn and X.

Secretary Kennedy Announces $100 Million Investment in Great American Recovery

0

(Department of Health and Human Services Press Release, February 2, 2026)

OXON HILL, MARYLAND—Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. today announced a comprehensive plan to strengthen prevention, expand treatment, and carry out the executive order President Trump signed last week to ignite the Great American Recovery. The centerpiece of this plan is a $100 million investment to solve long-standing homelessness issues, fight opioid addiction, and improve public safety by expanding treatment that emphasizes recovery and self-sufficiency.

The Safety Through Recovery, Engagement, and Evidence-based Treatment and Supports — or STREETS — Initiative will fund targeted outreach, psychiatric care, medical stabilization and crisis intervention, while connecting Americans experiencing homelessness and addiction to stable housing with a clear focus on long-term recovery and independence.

“Addiction begins in isolation and ends in reconnection,” said Secretary Kennedy, who is co-chair of President Trump’s Great American Recovery Initiative. “Thanks to the leadership of President Trump, we are bringing Americans suffering from addiction out of the shadows and back into community.”

Secretary Kennedy made the announcement at Prevention Day, the largest government-sponsored gathering dedicated to advancing the prevention of substance use, hosted by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), a division of HHS.

The $100 million investment directed by Secretary Kennedy is a clear departure from Biden-era policies that were misguided, failing to stem the tide of death, addiction, homelessness, and crime in American communities. These policies focused not on preventing and treating individuals, but rather non-effective interventions such as harm reduction, supporting housing first, and other strategies that enabled future drug use — and were never intended to support people in their recovery to lead productive lives in their communities.

Substance use disorder — impairment caused by repeated use of alcohol or other drugs — among people ages 12 and older rose from 7.4% in 2019 to 16.8% in 2024, according to SAMHSA survey data. Nearly 8 in 10 people with a substance use disorder in 2024 did not receive treatment.

Secretary Kennedy also announced the $10 million Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT) grant program to support adults with serious mental illness. AOT is a civil court-ordered, community-based outpatient mental health treatment program for adults with serious mental illness who are unable to engage with conventional outpatient treatment and are unlikely to be able to live safely in their community. The program is designed to work within the civil court system that supports engagement with community-based treatment as an alternative to more costly restrictive levels of care, homelessness, and interactions with the criminal justice system.

President Trump’s Executive Order Ending Crime and Disorder on America’s Streets on July 24, 2025 directed SAMHSA grants toward evidence-based substance use disorder programs with proven results and assisted outpatient treatment that moves people with serious mental illness or addiction off the streets and into stable housing and support networks. SAMHSA in September 2025 awarded more than $45 million in new supplemental funding to State Opioid Response program recipients to focus on sober or recovery housing among young adults.

The STREETS Initiative and AOT grant announcements coincide with SAMHSA’s $794 million first allocation of 2026 annual block grant awards, with $319 million going to support comprehensive community mental health services for adults with serious mental illness and children with serious emotional disturbance, and $475 million to the agency’s Substance Use Prevention, Treatment, and Recovery Services Block Grant program to prevent and treat substance abuse.

To help prevent family breakdown from substance use disorder, HHS’ Administration for Children and Families today under Secretary Kennedy’s plan added three Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) as prevention services eligible for federal funding. States and tribes can now receive a 50% federal match, respectively, to provide buprenorphine, methadone, and naltrexone to parents when children are at imminent risk of entering foster care but can remain safely in the home or in a kinship placement with access to these treatments.

All three MOUD are U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved, well-established, evidence-based tools that support recovery, promote family stability, and reduce risk factors associated with child welfare involvement.

SAMHSA and ACF intend to issue a Dear Colleague letter to emphasize that both agencies welcome full participation from faith-based organizations in their programs and activities.

President Trump declared upon establishing the White House Faith Office on February 7, 2025, “The executive branch wants faith-based entities, community organizations, and houses of worship, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to compete on a level playing field for grants, contracts, programs, and other Federal funding opportunities.”

Guest Columnist Idaho Senator Brian Lenney: Does Idaho HB 542 “Replace” Parents?

0

January 30, 2026

Does Idaho HB 542 “Replace” Parents?
Spoiler alert: yep, it sure does.

By: Idaho Senator Brian Lenney

Idaho just introduced a bill to “protect kids from social media”…

Finally, right? Something that actually targets Instagram and TikTok instead of making device manufacturers responsible for Meta’s mess. This is a far better idea than targeting device manufacturers like App Store Accountability Acts do.

H0542 would force platforms to get parental consent before kids under 17 can create accounts. It would strip out the addictive features like infinite scrolling and autoplay for children and make platforms verify ages and give parents monitoring tools.

Sounds like exactly what we need.

Except when you read the fine print, something feels off.

Yes, it makes social media companies responsible for age verification. And it makes them remove addictive features from kids’ accounts (that’s the right target, we don’t want device manufacturers to play police).

Except why do we need the government to do what parents can already do?

Because, while well-intentioned, this bill requires covered platforms to get “verifiable parental consent” before creating accounts for kids 16 and under. Platforms have to remove infinite scrolling, autoplay, push notifications for children’s accounts.

You know what else removes those features? Not giving your kid an Instagram account.

Instead, this creates a whole infrastructure for parental oversight through the platform. But parents already control whether their kid has a phone or apps.

You don’t need Meta to build you a “monitoring dashboard.”

You just… take the phone.

With this bill, companies like Meta have to estimate ages after 25 hours of use with 80% confidence. Then again at 50 hours with 90% confidence (keeps updating estimates every 100 hours).

But Meta already knows roughly how old their users are.

They collect birthdates. Their algorithms can infer age from behavior. They target ads to “13-year-old girls interested in fitness” with surgical precision. They’re not struggling to figure out who’s a kid.

The problem isn’t that social media companies can’t identify children. It’s that their entire business model depends on serving addictive algorithmic content to those children regardless of what harm it causes.

If you’re an engaged parent who monitors your kid’s online activity this bill gives you exactly zero new power you don’t already have.

You can say no to Instagram already. But if you’re a checked-out parent who gave unrestricted device access? You’ll click “approve” on the verifiable parental consent without reading it just like every Terms of Service you click through.

Your teenager will access social media through friends’ phones, web browsers, or the thousand workarounds kids have perfected.

Because the bill only covers accounts, not access. So the only thing this really accomplishes is forcing platforms to build expensive compliance systems while parents maintain the same level of actual control they always had.

Section 48-2106 says waivers of rights under this chapter are “void ab initio” and courts can’t enforce them.

Now there are two ways to read this:

(1) The harsh interpretation: the government is deciding that even if you as a parent review the terms, understand the risks, and consent to your 15-year-old having an Instagram account, that decision is automatically invalid as “contrary to public policy.” Your informed parental choices about your own child are void as a matter of law. The government overrides parental authority while claiming to protect it.

(2) The more charitable interpretation: the bill prevents platforms from pressuring parents into signing away the law’s protections through Terms of Service fine print. Meta couldn’t get you to contractually agree to let them skip removing infinite scrolling or waive your right to sue if they violate requirements. That would actually be protective.

But here’s where it gets murky.

The section says waivers of “any prohibition, requirement, or right to remedies” are void. So what counts as a waiver? Is your informed decision to let your kid have an Instagram account despite the law’s restrictions a “waiver” of protections? Or is it just parenting?

The bill requires verifiable parental consent to create accounts. So it recognizes parental authority to say yes. But then this section says parents can’t waive the specific protections the law mandates.

Maybe the intended reading is: you can consent to your kid having an account, but you can’t consent to Meta violating the specific requirements like removing addictive features.

That would be less about replacing parental authority and more about preventing platforms from exploiting parents with misleading contracts.

Either way, the ambiguity is a problem.

The bill also exempts accounts that have existed “continuously for at least seven years.”

So if your kid opened an Instagram account at age 10 (lying about their age, which happens constantly), by the time they’re 17 the platform has no obligation to verify anything. That exemption exists because forcing social media companies to age-verify millions of long-standing accounts would be impossibly expensive.

But it also means the kids who’ve been on these platforms longest get zero protections.

The bill also requires platforms to notify account holders before termination and give them 30 days to dispute age classification. This is a legal requirement, yes. But during the 30-day window the kid gets to keep using the platform exactly as before.

So we’re creating this massive regulatory apparatus that platforms can avoid by simply making age verification annoying enough that kids learn to game the system.

Private right of action with $10,000 statutory damages for reckless violations sounds tough, right? But Meta spent $24 million on lobbying in 2024 alone. More than Lockheed Martin. So they can afford armies of lawyers who will argue about what constitutes “reasonable means” for age estimation. Every case will get fought and every loss will get appealed.

Meanwhile, your 13-year-old is still scrolling through eating disorder content at 2am because you gave them a smartphone with unrestricted access and kept it in their bedroom.

You want to protect your kid from social media?

Don’t give them a smartphone until they’re older. Give them a flip phone if they need to stay in touch. Say no to social media and actually enforce it. Check their devices regularly. Keep phones out of bedrooms at night.

Those are parenting decisions that work immediately. You don’t need legislative infrastructure or enforcement mechanisms. Age estimation algorithms? Also not needed.

Idaho House Bill 542 treats the symptom instead of the cause.

And the cause? It’s parents handing their 12-year-olds unrestricted access to devices that Jonathan Haidt calls “the world’s most sophisticated drug delivery device” and then acting surprised when those kids develop anxiety and depression.

You made deliberate choices with predictable consequences.

It’s like giving your kid a handful of razor blades to play with and getting mad at the store who sold them to you when your kid gets hurt.

This bill targets the right entities. That’s progress. Removing infinite scrolling and push notifications from verified children’s accounts could reduce some addictive features. And if platforms can’t show targeted ads to kids, that removes one harm vector. Maybe that helps marginally.

But it’s still asking the government to regulate your kid’s social media consumption because you won’t.

And Meta will comply with the minimum requirements while finding new ways to maximize engagement and profit.

If this moves forward, platforms will figure out compliance. Lawyers will spend years in court arguing over definitions. Meanwhile regulations will get expanded to catch what the previous version missed, then expanded again when platforms find new workarounds.

But your kid will still be on Instagram unless you actually say no.

That’s the part no legislation can fix.

TLDR Idaho H542:

  1. Gives you zero new power – you already control whether your kid has a phone and social media
  2. Has easy workarounds – kids access through friends’ phones, web browsers, and all the other methods bill doesn’t cover
  3. Has a 7-year exemption backfire – because a kid who lied about their age at 10 gets zero protections by age 17 (the kids on platforms longest)
  4. Has a 30-day loophole – legally the platforms must notify before termination, which means the kid gets to keep using it during the “dispute period”
  5. Is compliance theater – platforms will build expensive systems while algorithms keep serving addictive content that falls just outside statutory definitions
  6. Solves the wrong problem – platforms monitor because parents won’t
  7. Lets social media companies win anyway – they’ll spend millions on lawyers and compliance, not fixing the harm their algorithms cause
  8. Treats the symptom not the cause – because it regulates features while ignoring that parents handed kids unrestricted access to “the world’s most sophisticated drug delivery device”