Friday, September 4, 2026
Home Blog Page 7

Idaho Freedom Caucus–Kratom Crazies: Hero complex and media panic fuel poor legislation

0

(Idaho Freedom Caucus, August 23, 2026)

 

The media loves to manufacture a crisis and many politicians love to play the hero to step in and save the day!

Today’s example of this is the absolute hysteria over an Indonesian leaf called Kratom.

People in Idaho have been using Kratom for years and even decades, often for arthritis and pain management, but also mood enhancement or even opioid withdrawal.

But this 2026 legislative session the hysteria got so intense that a freshman Idaho House member drafted a bill to ban natural leaf Kratom statewide and place it on Idaho’s Schedule One List alongside meth, heroin and fentanyl.

KTVB recently ran this sensational headline calling Kratom “Gas Station Heroin.” ‘Gas station heroin’: Idaho family shares warning after mother’s death linked to potent kratom compound | ktvb.com

The article opens up with a sad story about a 50-year-old woman, Kristy Boswell, who reportedly died after taking Kratom. However, you don’t have to be a member of the Health and Welfare Committee to know that medical issues can be rather complex.

To its credit, the KTVB article states that Ms. Boswell struggled with drug and alcohol addiction during her life. So, it seems logical that her body may have been weakened by those addictions over time.

But what a lot of people get wrong is Ms. Boswell did not, apparently, take Kratom. She took a compound called 7-OH.

Now it is true 7-OH is a compound found in Kratom. Due to our technological skill we are able to isolate the chemical compound in a lab and put it into a pill and sell it.

Here’s a question, did you know you can find cyanide inside apple seeds? It’s true and if you ate enough of them eventually it would make you sick and maybe even die.

But you probably wouldn’t ask your State Representative to draft legislation to ban apples from the grocery store over it.

What was hard for me to understand in the Committee hearing was why the author wouldn’t just propose a ban on 7-OH only. There seems to be widespread agreement on that. But instead of taking the victory and removing 7-OH (gas station heroin) from the shelves, she pushed for an all-out ban on natural leaf kratom as well.

The truth is Kratom has been available to the public for decades. In the Committee hearing and in preparation for the hearing to ban Kratom and 7-OH, we learned many people had taken natural leaf Kratom for up to 20 years with much benefit.

Why would we want to take natural leaf Kratom away from people for whom it is helping?

Further, it is ironic that the people trying to ban Kratom highlight the claim that withdrawal is very dangerous, and yet that is exactly what they will be causing with their ban.

And despite using that claim for political gain, proponents of the ban offered current kratom users nothing to help them withdrawal, effectively pulling the rug out from under them with little warning.

There was a Senate bill sponsored by Sen. Tammy Nichols that would have put Kratom on a regulatory structure (like most other imported products) where Kratom would be tested before distribution but the legislation was not able to find enough support before the session concluded.

Hopefully next January if the legislature takes up the issue we can tune out the emotional over-reaction and carefully listen to all sides.

By Rep. Rob Beiswenger, Republican, District 8, Member of the House Health and Welfare Committee

 

Guest Columnist SUFI Founder Doug Toomer: A Special Note Regarding Idaho’s 2026 Proposition 1 Initiative

0

August 22, 2026

A Special Note Regarding Idaho’s 2026 Proposition 1 Initiative

By: Stand Up For Idaho Founder Doug Toomer

You have some decisions to make this coming November election. Not only do you have to decide for whom to vote for in Idaho’s elected positions races (Governor, Lt. Governor, Attorney General, legislators, etc.), but you also need to decide whether you support Proposition 1 – the Reproductive Freedom and Privacy Act Initiative.

Proposition 1

The Proposition 1 (Prop 1) Initiative was started by a group called ‘Idahoans United for Women & Families’ (https://iduwf.org/). Their intent is to change Idaho’s abortion laws including allowing abortions up to birth. Their website provides statements in support for the Initiative as well as a few website links referring to the Initiative. I highly encourage you to read and understand the Initiative. Here’s a link to it from the Secretary of State’s office: Proposition 1 Initiative.

When I did an internet search, I was unable to find much support for Prop 1, other than the Idahoans United for Women & Families organization. However, there is a lot of opposition to Prop 1. Here are just a few links to the opposition:

We need to ask ourselves; “Why are hundreds of millions of dollars being spent to eliminate abortion laws and allow abortions up to the time of birth? Is it truly about an individual’s freedom to make their own reproductive health care decisions? Or could it be because abortion is a billion dollar industry and ‘baby parts’ are worth a lot of money?” The unsavory term ‘baby factories’ comes to mind. Here are some interesting articles:

There are several efforts by various parties statewide working to defeat Prop 1. The Idaho Republican Party is organizing to defeat the initiative and is seeking volunteers for 1) canvassing door to door, 2) office support, 3) recruiting, and 4) increasing social media presence.

If you live in eastern Idaho and are interested in volunteering for the effort to defeat Prop 1, Keith Keller is one of the Bonneville County coordinators. Keith can be contacted at (208) 524-3045 or kkpolitical@gmail.com.

Also, the ‘Leadership Institute’ is holding ‘Pro-Life Get-Out-The-Vote’ workshops (with free dinner) in Idaho falls, Pocatello, and Rexburg. You can register for a workshop here:

Stand Up For Idaho does not support Proposition 1, but we’re not going to tell you how to vote. Do your own research, then look into your heart and vote your conscience.

Thanks,

Doug

P.A.G.E.: Emails Prove Commissioner Hough Has Compromised LUDO Integrity; Should Recuse Himself

0
Pocatello for Accountable Government Entities: Keeping Government Accountable

(Pocatello for Accountable Government Entities, August 25, 2026)

In spite of statements to the media by Balanced Rock Power’s attorney trying to shape a favorable narrative, add this string of emails to the growing record of facts that show Commissioner Hough has been giving preferential treatment (i.e. early access to the Land Use and Development Ordinance (LUDO) drafts at various stages, soliciting feedback & comments from 3rd party special interests, direct access to a Commissioner, etc.) to a developer with a pecuniary (financial) interest in the Ordinance outcome and to a 3rd party advocacy group.

It makes sense that expertise from NEUTRAL third-parties acting in a formal advisory or consulting capacity might be valuable. The attorney for Balance Rock Power, the developer behind the 2600-acre Harmon Solar Project, and the Idaho Policy Manager for Renewable Idaho Northwest, a renewable energy advocacy group, are hardly neutral, in our opinion. Renewable Idaho Northwest’s annual report literally offers their support of Bannock County’s renewal ban reversal campaign “expected to wrap up in 2026” as one example of achieving their goal of “keeping Idaho open for renewable development.”

Our interest as P.A.G.E. is to ensure that government decisions are made fairly and without bias, especially when it comes to the Land Use and Development Ordinance that will impact entire communities. It is clear that Commissioner Hough is far from neutral on this issue. In our opinion, his actions over the months have compromised the integrity of the process, and he should recuse himself on any decisions related to the Land Use and Development Ordinance (LUDO) in Bannock County.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

AG Labrador Announces $29.6M Settlement with Glenmark Over Conspiracy to Inflate Prices, Limit Competition

0

(Attorney General’s Office Press Release, August 25, 2026)

BOISE, ID  Attorney General Raúl Labrador joined a coalition of 48 states and territories announcing a $29.6 million settlement with Glenmark to resolve allegations that the generic drug manufacturer engaged in a long-running conspiracy to artificially inflate prices, reduce competition, and unreasonably restrain trade with numerous generic prescription drugs. As part of the settlement agreement, Glenmark will cooperate in the ongoing multistate litigations against 33 corporate defendants and 25 individual executives. The company has further agreed to a series of internal reforms to ensure compliance with antitrust laws.

“These drug companies conspired to rig prices and eliminate competition, forcing Idaho consumers to pay artificially inflated costs for critical medications,” said Attorney General Labrador. “We will continue to pursue corporate defendants who participated in this illegal scheme that harms our families. Any Idahoan who paid for these generic drugs should file a claim for compensation.”

The Glenmark settlement follows settlements with Lannett, Bausch, Apotex and Heritage totaling $66.95 million.  This latest settlement comes as the States prepare for the first trial to be held in Hartford, Connecticut and anticipated to be scheduled in late 2026.

The case was built on evidence from several cooperating witnesses, a document database of over 20 million records, and phone records containing millions of call details and contact information for over 600 sales and pricing individuals in the industry. Each complaint lays out an interconnected web of competing industry executives that met with each other during industry dinners, “girls nights out,” lunches, cocktail parties, golf outings and communicated via frequent telephone calls, emails and text messages that sowed the seeds for their illegal agreements. Throughout the complaints, defendants use terms like “fair share,” “playing nice in the sandbox,” and “responsible competitor” to describe how they unlawfully discouraged competition, raised prices and enforced an ingrained culture of collusion.

Idahoans who purchased a generic prescription drug listed here between May 2009 and December 2019 may be eligible for compensation. To determine your eligibility, call 1-866-290-0182 (Toll-Free), email info@AGGenericDrugs.com, or visit www.AGGenericDrugs.com.

Idaho is one of only two states in the multistate coalition that also secured restitution for businesses impacted by the price-fixing conspiracies. Businesses in Idaho that indirectly purchased (i.e., purchased the drug from someone other than the manufacturer), paid for, and/or provided reimbursement for some or all of the purchase price for one of more of the generic prescription drugs listed here between May 2009 and December 2019 may also be eligible for compensation. For more information, visit: https://www.aggenericdrugs.com/English/CorporateEntities.

Pocatello PD’s 10 Days of Back-to-School Safety: Follow the Crossing Guard

0

(Pocatello Police Department, August 25, 2026)

Those crossing guards are out there to help keep our students safe—and they need everyone’s cooperation.

Drivers: When a crossing guard gives you a direction to stop, stop and wait. Do not go around them or proceed until it is safe and you are directed to do so.

Students and pedestrians: Follow the crossing guard’s instructions and wait for their signal before crossing.

Crossing guards are working hard to get students safely across busy streets. Give them your attention, respect, and cooperation.

We’re all on the same team when it comes to keeping our kids safe.

Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation, U.S. Forest Service Announce Historic Good Neighbor Authority Recreation Agreement

0

(Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation Press Release, August 25, 2026)

BOISE, Idaho — The Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation (IDPR) and the U.S. Forest Service are expanding their partnership through two Good Neighbor Authority (GNA) recreation agreements that will improve trails, restore access to public lands, and enhance outdoor recreation opportunities across Idaho.

The agreements build on the authorities established through the EXPLORE Act of 2025, allowing state and federal agencies to work together on recreation projects that improve public access and stewardship of National Forest lands.

One agreement, covering the Idaho Panhandle and Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests, is the first in the nation to utilize the EXPLORE Act’s Good Neighbor Authority recreation pilot. The partnership provides approximately $166,000 for recreation improvements, including maintenance of 115 miles of non-motorized trails and new or upgraded signage across 1,200 miles of winter recreation trails throughout North Idaho.

A second agreement with the Salmon-Challis National Forest will focus on maintaining recreation access within the Frank Church Wilderness and surrounding areas. Under the agreement, IDPR will assist with clearing downed trees and other obstacles from portions of 542 miles of trail impacted by wildfire, insects, and disease, while also supporting construction of a motorized trail that restores public access to a significant area of Idaho’s backcountry outside of the Frank Church Wilderness.

“These agreements represent the future of public land stewardship in Idaho,” said Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation Director Susan Buxton. “By partnering with the U.S. Forest Service through the Good Neighbor Authority, we’re protecting some of Idaho’s most treasured landscapes while making them more accessible for residents and visitors alike. Together, we’re ensuring our trails and recreation opportunities remain safe, sustainable, and enjoyable for generations to come.”

“The Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests and Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation have a long-standing history of working together to improve and maintain recreational access and opportunities,” said Forest Supervisor for the Nez Perce-Clearwater NFs, Jon Word. “Expanding this partnership through Good Neighbor Authority leverages our shared resources across boundaries, benefitting the public and the places we love to recreate.”

The agreements establish a framework for continued collaboration between IDPR and the U.S. Forest Service, with projects beginning in 2026 and expanding in future years. As outdoor recreation continues to grow across Idaho, these partnerships will help improve recreation infrastructure, restore access to public lands, and ensure Idaho’s forests remain welcoming destinations for all who enjoy the outdoors.

HHS Joins USDA to Announce Harvest to Hallways Initiative to Invest in School Nutrition Programs

0

(U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, August 24, 2026)

U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Secretary of Agriculture Brooke L. Rollins today announced sweeping new efforts to strengthen school meals by connecting more American farmers with local schools, investing in school kitchen infrastructure, and giving states and school districts new tools to serve healthier, more nutrient-dense meals to America’s children.

Secretary Kennedy joined Secretary Rollins at the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) alongside farmers, students, school nutrition leaders, athletes, chefs, and parents to announce the next phase of the Trump Administration’s work to Make America Healthy Again.

“Every school meal should make a child healthier,” said Secretary Kennedy. “Under President Trump’s leadership, we are putting the updated Dietary Guidelines into action by bringing real, nutrient-dense food back to school cafeterias and giving schools the tools to serve it affordably. Together with Secretary Rollins, we are building a school food system that supports American farmers and raises healthier American children.”

“If we want to Make America Healthy Again, we have to start with our children, and that means improving what we put on their lunch trays every single day,” said Secretary Brooke L. Rollins. “Harvest to Hallways is about bringing more American agriculture into the school cafeteria. We are connecting schools with the farmers and ranchers in their own communities, investing in the kitchens and equipment school nutrition professionals need to prepare real food, and cutting through barriers that have made it too difficult to serve healthy, American-grown food. When we strengthen the connection between the farm and the lunchroom, everybody wins: our children eat better, our farmers gain new markets, and our communities grow stronger.”

Harvest to Hallways includes up to $70 million in investment in school cafeteria infrastructure, an effort to expand schools’ use of local food procurement options, and up to $25 million in additional Farm to School Grants for Fiscal Year 2026.

Harvest to Hallways

The initiative includes several actions to improve school meals and strengthen the connection between American agriculture and America’s children:

  • Expanding Local Procurement: USDA will launch a major education and outreach campaign around the “Local Option” School Procurement Program, an existing procurement pathway that can allow schools to be reimbursed for purchases of locally produced foods. The Local Option has already been used in Union County, Kentucky, where school districts purchased locally produced beef. USDA will provide dedicated outreach and webinars to help more schools take advantage of the option.
  • Investing in School Kitchens: USDA will make a new $50 million investment in school cafeteria infrastructure to help qualifying schools purchase equipment such as cold storage and stoves, improve food safety, and establish, maintain, or expand School Breakfast Programs. The investment builds on recently announced National School Lunch Program Equipment Assistance Grants totaling $20 million. Secretaries Rollins and Kennedy will also work to encourage public-private partnerships to complement USDA’s investment.
  • Bringing More Local Food to Schools: USDA is announcing up to $25 million in new, additional Patrick Leahy Farm to School Grants for FY 2026. These investments help schools incorporate locally produced foods into child nutrition programs while creating new market opportunities for American farmers and ranchers. Previous projects include the Pennsylvania Beef Council’s work with 175 local schools to bring locally raised beef to nearly 300,000 students.
  • Accelerating Healthier Meals: USDA and HHS will encourage greater state adoption of the Pledge for Healthier School Meals, which encourages updated nutrition practices aligned with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2025–2030 that can be implemented immediately.
  • Investing in School Meal Nutrition Research: HHS will invest $30 million in research to identify practical, cost-effective ways to improve the nutritional quality of school meals and help schools put healthier meals on students’ trays.

Together, these actions advance the Make America Healthy Again agenda by improving the food served to America’s children, strengthening school kitchens, and creating stronger connections between American farmers and the communities they feed.

Bannock County Coroner’s Office Clarifies Policy Requiring Definitive Identification Prior to Cremations

0

(Bannock County Press Release, August 25, 2026)

BANNOCK COUNTY, Idaho – The Bannock County Coroner’s Office is reiterating its commitment to public accountability and family peace of mind following recent media reports regarding cremation authorizations.

Under Idaho statute, coroners must authorize all cremations before they occur. In January 2026, the Coroner’s Office established a policy requiring a form confirming the definitive identification of all decedents before cremation authorization is granted. The updated policy requires local funeral homes and mortuaries to submit a Definitive Identification of Decedent Form verifying that remains have been identified using reliable, acceptable methods satisfied by the next of kin.

Protecting Families and Maintaining Safeguards

The policy stems from vulnerabilities exposed during the 2021 Downard Funeral Home case. Because cremation permanently destroys all biological and genetic markers, strict verification is critical to prevent the cremation of unidentified or improperly identified remains. For most standard cases, completing this process is straightforward and can be accomplished through next of kin.

“Our priority is to protect grieving families and ensure they receive their loved one’s remains with absolute certainty,” said Bannock County Coroner Torey Danner. “This standard aims to prevent errors that can never be undone, ensuring no family is left wondering about the status or location of their loved one’s remains.”

Response to Recent Filings

Regarding recent reports concerning three cremation authorization requests submitted by Cornelison Funeral Home, the Coroner’s Office confirms that the initial requests were withheld because the mandatory identification forms were not provided.

Following a hearing on Monday, August 24, 2026, the required identification documentation was submitted to the Coroner’s Office, and authorization for all three cremations was promptly issued.

The Bannock County Coroner’s Office will continue to enforce these verification standards uniformly across all licensed care facilities to ensure the highest level of dignity, statutory compliance, and trust for the community. Should further legal proceedings related to this matter come forth, Bannock County will respond appropriately through the court system rather than through the media.

Guest Column from Stop Idaho RINOs: Prop 1 Is Not About Freedom. It’s About Death.

0

August 24, 2026

Prop 1 Is Not About Freedom. It’s About Death.

By: Stop Idaho RINOs

They gave it a soft name. The Reproductive Freedom and Privacy Act. Doesn’t that sound harmless? Freedom. Privacy. Who could be against that?

Here’s the thing. When you have to hide what a law does behind pretty words, it’s because the truth would sink it. And the truth about Prop 1 is ugly.

Life begins at conception. That is not a slogan. It is a fact of biology and a truth we hold to our core. From the moment of conception, that is a distinct human life, with its own DNA, its own heartbeat coming, its own future. It is not a clump of cells. It is not a choice. It is a child.

Prop 1 says that child can be killed. And it goes much further than the people selling it want you to know.

Abortion up to birth, for any reason

The campaign wants you to think this is about medical emergencies and rare tragic cases. It is not.

Prop 1 allows abortion up to what it calls “viability.” But it redefines that word. Under Prop 1, a baby is not viable until it can survive without extraordinary medical measures. No oxygen. No NICU. No help of any kind. A baby born a month early who needs a little help to breathe would not count as viable under their definition. Which means there is no real line at all.

Read that again. Prop 1 opens the door to abortion up to birth. A baby that could live outside the womb, that could be held and fed and loved, can be ended. For any reason. Or for no reason at all.

That is not healthcare. That is killing a child who is ready to be born.

They are lying about miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies

One of the biggest scare tactics behind Prop 1 is the claim that Idaho women cannot get treated for a miscarriage or an ectopic pregnancy. That doctors have to stand there and watch a woman suffer. It is false. Flat out false.

Idaho law already handles this, and it says so in plain words. Back in 2023, the Legislature amended the statute so that treating an ectopic or molar pregnancy is not an abortion. Removing a baby who has already died from a miscarriage is not an abortion. Treating a woman who is no longer pregnant is not an abortion. None of it is banned.

So when they tell you a woman cannot be treated, they are counting on you not knowing the law. They are using real fear about real medical situations to sell you something that has nothing to do with those situations. That is not honesty. That is manipulation. And it tells you everything about how confident they are in the actual argument.

It strips away every protection we have built

For thirty years, Idahoans worked to protect life and protect families. Parental consent. A ban on late-term abortion. A waiting period. A woman’s right to see an ultrasound before making an irreversible decision.

Prop 1 wipes all of it out.

It grants the so-called right to “every person,” regardless of age. Think about what that means. Your fifteen-year-old daughter could be taken for an abortion, and you would have no right to know. The people who wrote this measure decided that a stranger at a clinic should have more say over your child than you do.

The language is a blank check

The measure creates a broad new right to “reproductive freedom and privacy.” The list of what it covers is written with the words “including but not limited to.” Lawyers do not choose those words by accident. They choose them to leave the door open.

Once you write “bodily autonomy” and “privacy” into law with no real limits, you do not get to decide where courts stop. They do. And activist courts have shown us again and again that they will stretch vague language as far as it will go.

That same broad language is exactly how so-called gender-affirming care for minors gets lumped in. It is already happening in other states. Frame it as a private decision about one’s own body, and there is nothing in Prop 1 that clearly keeps it out. Idaho spent real effort protecting children from those procedures. Prop 1 threatens to hand it all back through a loophole the authors were careful to leave wide open.

Follow the money

Just like the last Prop 1, the ranked choice voting scheme Idahoans crushed two years ago, this one runs on out-of-state cash. National groups have looked at Idaho and decided our values are for sale. They are betting that a gentle name and a slick campaign can get you to vote for something you would never accept if they told you the truth.

They are counting on you not reading the fine print.

This is a line we do not cross

I know some good people are torn. They hear the words rape, incest, life of the mother, and their hearts move. That is a decent instinct. But Prop 1 does not stop there, and the people who wrote it know it does not stop there. They used your compassion as the door to walk something far darker through.

Every life is precious. The unborn child. The teenage girl who deserves her parents at her side. The baby eight months along who is one month from her first breath. None of them are a burden to be discarded. All of them bear the image of God.

Prop 1 asks you to look away. To call the killing of a child freedom. To call it privacy. To call it care.

Do not look away. Call it what it is.

Vote NO on Prop 1.

Guest Columnist Idaho Senator Brian Lenney: Idaho’s $50 Billion Handout

0

August 22, 2026

Idaho’s $50 Billion Handout

By: Idaho Senator Brian Lenney

A guy on X posted this week that the “experts are in shock,” that Micron is putting $50 billion into Boise, that it’ll produce 17,000 jobs, and that this is huge for Americans.

We’ve spent decades being trained to cheer at numbers. A random figure gets announced, a governor stands next to a hard hat with a golden shovel, and we’re all supposed to feel something.

I have a different take:

In 2008 the legislature passed House Bill 562 to lure Areva, a French nuclear company, into building an enrichment plant near Idaho Falls. It said if you put $1 billion into the state within seven years, your taxable property value gets capped at $400 million forever.

The French never showed (shocking). But Micron hit the threshold in 2011 and took the deal written for somebody else.

By 2019 Micron’s Boise plant was assessed at $1.86 billion. Without the cap, that footprint would have owed $20.32 million in property tax the following year. Its actual bill in 2024 was $3.4 million. The new build sits under a separate entity, so it gets a second $400 million cap. Then House Bill 678 in 2022 killed the sales tax on construction materials, and Washington added $6.165 billion in CHIPS money too.

Micron passed a $1 trillion market cap this spring and has been above it since, on $90 billion of revenue at a 56% net margin. This week it announced a $10 billion AI research lab in Boise, funded out of pocket.

That’s the company we decided needed “relief.”

But wait, there’s more! In 2020 the legislature passed House Bill 521, exempting data centers from sales tax. The bar: $250 million invested within five years, and 30 permanent jobs.

That’s not a typo: 30.

Meta turned up almost immediately with an $800 million campus on farm ground outside Kuna, a town of 25,000. It has since crossed the $400 million threshold too (permanent headcount is around 100) and its record with kids is no mystery with headlines like:

What does it cost you?

A Boise homeowner pays about $300 a year more than he otherwise would, a Kuna homeowner about $160. Those are Ada County numbers and I represent Nampa, so here’s how it reaches us: the sales tax exemptions are statewide. Every dollar we forgive in Boise or Kuna is a dollar the general fund doesn’t have, and that fund pays for stuff in Nampa and Caldwell and Melba.

Call it what it is: this is a retired couple in Kuna sending money to Menlo Park, or a framer in Nampa sending money to shareholders in New York and Riyadh.

Chris Bruce and Lori Den Hartog tried to trim it back this session with House Bill 897. I voted yes. Micron objected to the part touching its property tax cap, and it died in the House.

Why these bills always die

Here’s a big part of it: dinners, receptions, drunken trips somewhere a lot nicer than Boise in January on somebody else’s plane. I get the invitations. Once in a while I’ll go to something if there’s an actual reason (but we’re talking single digits out of a hundred). Saying no to the other ninety-some is a large part of why I have time to sit here and write this.

A lobbyist isn’t a stranger to anybody in that building. He’s there every day of the session. He learns a member’s kids’ names, asks after the wife, buys dinner, drinks, and who knows what else. There’s wine and shots and drunk legislators, and by March many legislators have eaten 40 meals with their lobbyist “friends” and maybe two with their own families.

Then a bill comes up and he says what he needs, and it doesn’t land on that member as a bribe.

It lands as a favor for a “friend.”

The filing burden falls on the lobbyist, not the legislator, and most of what he files is a lump sum by category. Entertainment. Travel. Lodging. A dollar number with nobody’s name attached to it.

Then at the end there’s a banquet where a lobbying group hands out awards for being a “friend of Idaho business.” None of this is the exception. It’s how that building works, and a big chunk of the legislature takes part in it. Nobody breaks a law but somehow men who consider themselves honest cast votes they couldn’t explain at home, because the man who asked was a “friend” who bought them drinks.

Nobody asked about the jobs

But I digress…

Go read House Bill 562 and find me the part that requires anybody to hire anybody.

It isn’t in there. Section 63-4502 defines a qualifying investment as a billion dollars of construction and equipment. That’s the whole test. No employment floor, no wage standard, no residency requirement, not one word about a human being.

Buy the machines, skip the taxes, forever.

Meanwhile Micron filed 573 labor condition applications last year. H-1B doesn’t spread evenly across a new build. It concentrates in exactly the roles a kid from Nampa with an engineering degree is aiming at. Process. Yield. Integration. Design. The construction and technician jobs mostly go local while the career goes to a guy from India.

And that Indian can’t quit. His status belongs to his employer, so he doesn’t push on wages, doesn’t jump to a competitor, and doesn’t file the complaint. That’s not a knock on him. It’s a knock on a company that would rather have a workforce it owns than one it has to bargain with, the same instinct that shipped our plants to China and called it efficiency.

So about those 17,000 jobs. Maybe Micron delivers every one of them. But nothing in Idaho law says they have to, nothing says the jobs go to Idahoans, and nothing happens if the number comes in at 6,000.

We held $50 billion worth of negotiating position and asked for nothing.

What to do

I’m bringing a bill to repeal all of it. Not sunset it. Not index it. Repeal.

Title 63, Chapter 45, the $400 million cap. Written for a company that never came, passed 41 to 27, no member’s name on the bill, and they declared an emergency to backdate it. Brad Little even voted no on it when he was a legislator.

Idaho Code 63-3622VV. The data centers. Thirty jobs.

Idaho Code 63-3622WW. Read subsection 4(e): to qualify you have to already be collecting CHIPS money and already be claiming the 2008 cap. We wrote the old giveaway into the new one as a prerequisite. It’s a corporate welfare ladder, and we built every rung ourselves.

Three sections need to go.

Because a tax break for one company is a tax increase on everybody else. And a business that has to be paid to come here is coming for the check, not for Idaho. It’ll leave for a bigger one.

America First isn’t a line for a mailer…

It means the American worker comes before the shareholder, the kid from Nampa gets first look at the job in his own state, and a trillion-dollar corporation that wants our power and water and roads pays the same freight as the framer down the road and hires our kids while it’s here.

I’m tired of watching my own party act like the Chamber of Commerce with a flag pin on and what I actually want is harder to put in the tax code. I want a kid who grows up in Nampa to be able to stay in Nampa, own a house on one income, and bury his parents in the county he was born in.

That used to be ordinary here, and no press release with a big number in it is going to bring it back.